A buyer agrees to purchase “two cars” from an elevator company. All material terms are
contained in a written contract, but “two cars” is not further defined. Which of the
following evidence can be admitted if there is a dispute over the meaning of “two cars?”
A) Oral evidence that before the signing of the contract the parties intended the contract
to be for the purchase of three cars.
B) Oral evidence that before the signing of the written agreement the elevator company
said it would extend its normal one-year warranty (which is stated in the written
contract) to two years.
C) Oral evidence that the word “car” refers to an elevator, because that is how the word
“car” is used in the elevator industry, and that it does not refer to any of the company’s
automobiles.
D) Written evidence from prior to the signing of the written contract that the parties
intended the contract to be for the purchase of three cars.
E) The parole evidence rule prevents any additional evidence from being considered,
even if terms are not clear on their face.
Charlie is a contractor contacted by Hilda to discuss repairing termite damage to Hilda’s
home. The damage is so extensive that Charlie doubts the home can be saved. Hilda
begs Charlie to try to repair the home. Charlie tells Hilda that he will do the best he can
but cannot promise that the he will be successful. He will charge Hilda $60 per hour
whether or not he succeeds. Hilda agrees to these terms. Which of the following is true
in this situation?
A) This is a best efforts contract properly supported by consideration on both sides.
B) This is an illusory promise because Charlie is not obligated to repair the damage.