Marta, Assunta’s cousin, also had purchased XYZ stock at $35 per share and made a
similar call to the broker and received the same response. Marta, however,
coincidentally saw the price on a stock ticker tape when she hung up and realized the
broker had made an error. Both Assunta and Marta held the stock and did not sell.
Later that same day, the stock price fell an additional $7 per share. Facing sizable
losses, both Assunta and Martha decided to sue for fraud when Marta told Assunta of
the broker’s misstatement. Discuss the probable outcome of the lawsuits.
Action taken by shareholders without holding a meeting is valid under the RMBCA if it
is evidenced by a written consent signed by all the shareholders entitled to vote on the
action.
John received a promotion at work and felt new clothes would be necessary in the new
position. John went to a local store and charged three ties on his charge account at a
cost of $60 each. Bill, a friend of John’s, saw a sidewalk vendor selling ties at a cost of
three for $10 and bought three at that price. The friends compared purchases that night
and found that they had purchased identical ties. John became enraged and said that he
would not pay the charge-account bill because the ties were clearly not worth $60 each.
Bill indicated that he would testify on John’s behalf if litigation ensued. What would be
the probable outcome of the lawsuit?