Which of the following is true?
A) Past consideration is sufficient legal consideration to enforce an agreement.
B) Contracts based on a party’s past consideration are unenforceable unless some new
consideration is given to support the contract.
C) Contracts based on a party’s past consideration are known as illusory contracts.
D) Contracts based on a party’s past consideration are generally enforceable on the
grounds of moral obligation.
E) Contracts based on a party’s past consideration are known as quasi-contracts.
Bob sells real estate in Knoxville, Tennessee for a real estate sales company. One
afternoon, he shows a client two homes in Knoxville, and the client tells Bob that there
is a great cabin for sale in Gatlinburg, about 40 miles from Knoxville. Bob drops the
client off in Knoxville and travels to Gatlinburg to check out this property, because he
would like to purchase a place for his family to “get away” on weekends. As he is
entering Gatlinburg, he accidentally hits and injures a pedestrian. In determining
whether Bob’s employer can be held liable, a court will:
A) apply the “work-related” test and find the employer liable.
B) not find the employer liable under the “coming and going” rule.
C) use the “frolic and detour” rule to determine the employer’s liability.
D) determine the outcome based on the degree of disclosure of the agency relationship.
E) apply the “motivation” test, and find the employer liable.