A vertical allocation of customers or territory:
a. is a per se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
b. is a rule of reason violation of the Sherman Act.
c. is not a violation of the Sherman Act.
d. is illegal if it adversely affects competition at any stage of the marketing channel.
Buck, fearing death from severe injuries suffered in a machinery accident, assigned
over a certificate of deposit worth $100,000 and delivered the certificate to Pearl, a
friend, who gladly accepts. Buck ends up recovering from the injuries. Why must Pearl
give the certificate of deposit back to Buck?
a. This type of gift is known as a gift causa mortis. It is a conditional gift which is
conditioned on Buck’s actually dying. Because Buck recovered, the gift is automatically
revoked.
b. This is an inter vivos gift because Buck was still alive when the gift was made. Any
inter vivos gift is revocable because there is no consideration to make Buck’s delivery
of the certificate binding under contract law.
c. This is an inter vivos gift and due to state laws, gifts in contemplation of death must
be written into a valid will or otherwise the deceased’s assets will be distributed
according to state statute.
d. This gift is an ordinary gift, but it is revocable because we don’t know if the
certificate of deposit has matured or not.