In a recent case, In re Nuijten, the U.S. appeals court ruled that a method of encoding
additional information on electronic signals emitted from digital audio files was not
patentable because, although useful, the method was not a mechanical, electrical, or
chemical invention, a process, a machine, or the composition of matter.
a. True
b. False
Wendell, new to the area, selects a doctor from the telephone book and visits that doctor
to have a splinter extracted. Unbeknownst to Wendell, the doctor has never passed the
state licensing exams. Later, when Wendell discovers the truth, he refuses to pay his
bill. If the doctor sues for recovery of the fee, will the court support the doctor’s claim?
a. Yes, it was up to Wendell to verify the doctor’s qualifications prior to having the
splinter extracted.
b. No, the court is likely to take the position that it is not in the public’s best interests to
enforce contracts with unlicensed doctors.
c. It depends on whether Wendell’s injury healed properly.
d. No, but the doctor could probably recover under quasi-contract.