Suppose $1 billion is available in the budget and Congress is considering allocating the
funds to one of the following three alternatives: 1. Subsidies for education, 2. Research
on Alzheimer’s or 3. Increased border security. Table 18-1 shows three voters’ rankings
of the alternatives.
Refer to Table 18-1.Suppose a series of votes are taken in which each pair of
alternatives is considered in turn. If the vote is between allocating funds to education
subsidies and increased border security
A) Ivy and Jasmine vote for education subsidies, Rose votes for increased border
security, and education subsidies wins.
B) Ivy and Rose vote for increased border security, Jasmine votes for education
subsidies, and increased border security wins.
C) Jasmine and Rose vote for education subsidies, Rose votes for increased border
security, and education subsidies wins.
D) Jasmine and Ivy vote for increased border security, Rose votes for education
subsidies, and increased border security wins.
One argument advanced in favorof not increasing the income tax on individuals with
high income is that
A) increasing income tax increases wealth which contributes to increases in GDP.
B) increasing the income tax on these individuals will reduce economic efficiency.
C) increasing the income tax affects mostly middle-income and low-income individuals
who are already paying heavy income taxes.
D) not increasing income taxes will discourage corporations from increasing
investment.