Answer:
Which of the following was the result in the Quickturn Design Sys., Inc.v. Shapiro case,
which involved a Delaware court’s ruling on the “no-hand pill”?
a. As a matter of law the pill was valid as a response to a takeover bid regardless of
whether independent proof existed that the directors acted reasonably.
b. The pill was valid because the directors established, based upon reliable expert
testimony, that the hostile takeover bid presented a dangerous threat to the continuation
of the company.
c. The pill, which had to be redeemed within one month of a takeover bid or else be
allowed to remain in place, was invalid because it impermissibly circumscribed the
board’s statutory power to manage the business affairs of the company and the directors’
ability to fulfill their fiduciary duties.
d. The pill, which could not be redeemed for six months following a takeover, was
invalid because it impermissibly circumscribed the board’s statutory power to manage
the business affairs of the company and the directors’ ability to fulfill their fiduciary
duties.
Answer:
The __________ Clause of the U.S. Constitution states that the Constitution, laws, and
treaties of the United States take precedence over state laws and that the judges of the
state courts must follow federal law.
a. Supremacy
b. Federalization