The main question for the U.S. Supreme Court in CASE 10.4 Mutual Pharmaceutical
Co., Inc. v. Bartlett (2013) was whether:
a. New Hampshire’s “risk-utility” analysis was Constitutional.
b. New Hampshire had properly licensed Mutual Pharmaceutical to dispense
medications within its boundaries.
c. the generic drug Clinoril was properly prescribed to patient Bartlett.
d. consumers could sue generic drug manufacturers for defectively designed drugs that
makes them unreasonably dangerous.
Answer:
Under the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA), what would be
the result if an electronic agent agrees to a click-wrap agreement?
a. The user of the electronic agent would not be liable for the agreement.
b. The user of the electronic agent would be liable for the agreement only if the
evidence established that the user had an opportunity to look over the agreement and
cancel it within a reasonable length of time.
c. The use of the electronic agent would be liable for the agreement.
d. The user of the electronic agent would be liable for the agreement only if the user
was a merchant in respect to goods or services of the type purchased by the agreement.