In which of the following situations is employing a “think local, act local”
multidomestic strategy highly questionable?
A. When a company desires to transfer competencies and resources across country
boundaries and is striving to build a single, uniform competitive advantage worldwide
B. When there are significant country-to-country differences in customer preferences
and buying habits industry is characterized by big economies of scale and strong
experience curve effects
C. When the trade restrictions of host governments are diverse and complicated
D. When there are significant country-to-country differences in distribution channels
and marketing methods
E. When host governments enact regulations requiring that products sold locally meet
strictly defined manufacturing specifications or performance standards
Despite their obvious benefits, think-local, act-local strategies have three big
drawbacks:
1) They hinder transfer of a company’s capabilities, knowledge, and other resources
across country boundaries, since the company’s efforts are not integrated or coordinated
across country boundaries. This can make the company less innovative overall.
2) They raise production and distribution costs due to the greater variety of designs and
components, shorter production runs for each product version, and complications of
added inventory handling and distribution logistics.
3) They are not conducive to building a single, worldwide competitive advantage.
When a company’s competitive approach and product offering vary from country to
country, the nature and size of any resulting competitive edge also tends to vary. At the
most, multidomestic strategies are capable of producing a group of local competitive
advantages of varying types and degrees of strength.
Which of the following is NOT generally on a company’s menu of actions to consider in