Napoleon is contemplating four institutions of higher learning as options for a Masters
in Business Administration. Each university has strong and weak points and the demand
for MBA graduates is uncertain. The availability of jobs, student loans, and financial
support will have a significant impact on Napoleon’s ultimate decision. Vanderbilt and
Seattle University have comparatively high tuition, which would necessitate Napoleon
take out student loans resulting in possibly substantial student loan debt. In a tight
market, degrees with that cachet might spell the difference between a hefty paycheck
and a piddling unemployment check. Northeastern State University and Texas Tech
University hold the advantage of comparatively low tuition but a more regional appeal
in a tight job market. Napoleon gathers his advisory council of Kip and Pedro to assist
with the decision. Together they forecast three possible scenarios for the job market and
institutional success and predict annual cash flows associated with an MBA from each
institution. All cash flows in the table are in thousands of dollars.
Kip tends to be extremely optimistic. Which decision making criterion would he
naturally select and what conclusion would he recommend to Napoleon? Why?
An investor is consider four different opportunities, A, B, C, or D. The payoff for each
opportunity will depend on the economic conditions, represented in the payoff table
below.
Economic ConditionPoor Average Good Excellent