Kate is an underwriter who acted as a third party conducting a sale of securities
between Fox Co. and an investor. Subsequent to the sale it is discovered that the
disclosures made by Fox Co. were fraudulent. The investor has sued both Fox Co. and
Kate. What is Kate’s best defense to avoid liability?
A. proving that she actually did not profit from the transaction
B. proving that the fraud was so sophisticated that even if she had investigated the
preregistration and registration documentation, she probably wouldn’t have discovered
the fraud anyway
C. proving that the issuing company had a long history of truthful disclosures and had
never been suspected or investigated for fraud, so she was able to rely on their
representations
D. proving that she exercised due diligence in examining the preregistration and
registration documentation and did not discover the fraud
The highest and most comprehensive duty owed by a landowner to a person on the
owner’s property is owed to:
A. an invitee.
B. a licensee.
C. an accidental trespasser.
D. an intentional trespasser.