A. The employee has exhausted the internal procedures and possibilities within the
firm, maybe even to the board of directors.
B. The employee has good reason to believe that by going public, the necessary changes
will be brought about.
C. The firm will do serious and considerable harm to employees or to the public.
D. The employee has reported the serious threat to his/her immediate supervisor.
Answer:
Which of the following is a Kantian argument against discrimination?
A. Since the least advantaged in a society would be better off in a nondiscriminatory
society than in one that discriminates, the rational person would see that
nondiscrimination is morally preferable.
B. People are treated as members of class with a certain characteristic, not as persons.
They are not ends in themselves, but because of that characteristic, they are denied
equal treatment and respect.
C. The dominant class has a desire to maintain its superiority and its class prerogatives.
D. Systematic discrimination produces a class of people who are arguably treated
unjustly. Other groups in the society will also have cause to worry about whether they
will be the next group to be discriminated against. On the whole, more harm than good
is done.
Answer: