James Keller was an employee at Radical Boards, Inc.Radical Boards is a surf and
skateboard shop that also sells clothing. While employed there, Radical Board’s
principal shareholder discovered that Keller had created peep holes in the shop’s
dressing rooms. When confronted with the peep holes, Keller denied every using them
and indicated that they were there to prevent shoplifting. The shop manager was told to
fire Keller. Shortly after Keller left, a 16-year-old and her mother filed suit because the
teen learned, through conversations with Keller, that he had seen her in the dressing
room while she was trying on swimming suits. Keller was able to describe her not-
generally-seen birthmarks to her. Radical Boards:
a. cannot be held liable to the teen and her mother because it did engage in the conduct.
b. could be held liable under a theory of negligent failure to supervise.
c.is no longer liable because it terminated Keller.
d.has not committed any tort because watching customers in dressing rooms in part of a
merchant’s right. e. none of the above
An unconstitutionally vague statute is a violation of substantive due process rights.
a. True
b. False
Which of the following is not a Section 12 violation?