Preferred Contractors was a general contractor and owner of a condominium complex
that was under construction. Barrett, a subcontractor, had been hired by Henderson
Plumbing, another subcontractor, to help it complete the plumbing work on the project.
When Henderson began using shoddy installation procedures and subsequently fell
behind the scheduled completion time for the project, Preferred Contractors urged
Barrett to correct Henderson’s mistakes and to finish the job. Barrett refused to continue
until he knew who would pay him, since he feared Henderson’s financial position was
shaky. Nonetheless, Preferred Contractors job superintendent told Barrett to go ahead
even if Barrett and Preferred Contractors had no contract because “he would use his
influence to try to help Barrett get his money.” Barrett finished the work and sent a
$7,500 bill to Henderson, which was never paid. When Barrett later sent the bill to
Preferred Contractors, these facts emerged: Preferred Contractors told him that due to
Barrett’s failure to notify Preferred Contractors promptly of Henderson’s non-payment,
Preferred Contractors had already paid Henderson in full and therefore would not pay
twice for the work. Discuss the best possible theory of recovery Barrett may argue.
Trent was the production manager at HGB, Inc. Under his supervision, HGB filled in an
area of wetlands on the company’s property without a permit. Has Trent violated the
law? What penalties might he face?