much as she thought she would. Her friend Lydia bought it from Karen for $100. If the
first day that Lydia used the stair stepper it fell apart, injuring Lydia’s ankle:
a. Lydia can sue Karen for breach of the warranty of merchantability, because the stair
stepper is not fit for its ordinary purpose.
b. Karen can sue the manufacturer for breach of the warranty of merchantability,
because she was the original buyer.
c. Lydia cannot sue Karen for warranting that the stair stepper is reasonably fit for its
ordinary purpose, because Karen is not a merchant.
d. Lydia cannot sue Karen, because they are not in privity of contract.
Alex wants to submit a bid on a city sewer project. He computes the cost, but
mistakenly omits the cost of one item. Accordingly, he submits a bid of $430,000 to the
city. The next highest bid is $675,000, and the rest of the bids are even higher. The city
is happy to have such a low bid, so it accepts Alex’s bid and awards him the contract for
the job, even though the city engineer is of the opinion the job cannot be done for less
than $650,000. In this case:
a. Alex must perform for the agreed upon price because he has made a unilateral
mistake.
b. the city was aware of or should have been aware of Alex’s mistake. When it accepted
the bid with knowledge of Alex’s mistake, the city sought to take an unconscionable
advantage of Alex’s error.
c. there was a palpable unilateral mistake.
d. Both (b) and (c).