Grady receives a $12,940 credit card bill in the mail from a company with which he did
not open an account. He fears he is a victim of identity theft. Does he have any
recourse?
a. Yes, under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA), Grady can place
an alert in his credit files using the National Fraud Alert System.
b. Yes, under the Fair Credit Billing Act he may call the credit card company to
complain about the bill, and the credit card company must investigate and correct any
errors.
c. Yes, under the Truth in Lending Act, Grady is liable only for the first $50 in
unauthorized charges.
d. No, he should have been more careful with his personal information so no one could
have applied for credit in his name.
Peter Dementas helped Jack Tallas with numerous personal and business chores
towards the end of his life. Two months before his death, Tallas dictated a memorandum
to Dementas, in Greek, stating: PETER K. DEMENTAS is my best friend I have in this
country, … he treats me like a father and I think of him as my own son. …For all the
services Peter has given me all these years, I owe to him the amount of $50,000 (Fifty
Thousand Dollars). I will shortly change my will to include him as my heir. Tallas
signed the memorandum, but he did not in fact alter his will to include Dementas.
This was a real case. The Utah appeals court would rule:
a. there was no consideration to support Tallass promise.
b. there is a “moral obligation exception to the requirement of consideration, and
therefore Tallass promise was supported by consideration.
c. because Utah does not recognize the “moral obligation exception to the requirement
of consideration, Dementas prevails.
d. the trial courts finding that the services rendered by Dementas to Tallas were
performed gratuitously was erroneous.