Theresa and Bobbi bought a racecar together. They agreed to share all expenses and
split net profits equally. There was no agreement as to the duration of the partnership.
After about a year, Bobbi decided she was tired of the racing business and left the
partnership. Bobbi did not violate the partnership agreement. Theresa claims Bobbi’s
leaving was wrongful. Is Theresa correct?
a. Yes, Bobbi was legally required to secure Theresa’s permission before leaving the
partnership.
b. Yes, Bobbi had a legal duty to stay in the partnership until Theresa was willing to
agree to end the relationship.
c. Yes, Bobbi had a legal duty to stay in the partnership until a new partner could be
found.
d. No, in a partnership at will, a partner has the right to leave the partnership at any
time.
Jeremy was terminated by his employer for violating company rules. He challenged the
termination by filing a grievance. Eventually, the matter went to arbitration and
Jeremy’s termination was ruled to have been improper. The employer filed a claim in
court to have the arbitrator’s ruling overturned since it claimed the facts clearly
demonstrated Jeremy had violated the express rules of the company. The employer
claimed that the arbitrator had ignored the obvious and had committed a serious mistake
of fact. A court may refuse to enforce an arbitrators ruling if:
a. it is proven that the arbitrator made a serious error of fact.
b. the court finds the ruling is contrary to public policy.
c. Both of the above are correct.
d. Neither of the above is correct.