A.approximately conform to all of the details of the contract.
B.entirely conform to the contract except in one or two details.
C.exactly conform to the contract in every detail.
D.substantially conform to the contract in most details.
Baked Goods Company agrees to supply Comida Caf with all the corn chips that it
requires for a year. A sudden demand for ethanol results in a shortage of corn, and the
price rises sharply. Baked Goods asks Comida to pay a higher price for the chips. This
request is
A.invalid as an attempt at extortion or the so-called holdup game.
B.invalid under the preexisting duty rule.
C.valid as a risk ordinarily assumed in business.
D.valid due to the unforeseen difficulty of the sudden price increase.
In Ben v. City Car Dealership, a state supreme court held that a minor could cancel a
contract for the sale of a car. Now a trial court in the same state is deciding Daphne v.
Even Steven Auto Deals, Inc., a case with similar facts. Under the doctrine of stare
decisis, the trial court is likely to
A.allow the minor in the Daphne case to cancel the contract.
B.disregard the Ben case.