Florida public policy is to protect consumers from unfair and deceptive business
practices. A state statute declares unenforceable any waiver of its provisions, which
include a provision for consumer class actions. WISP Inc. requires its customers to sign
an agreement that designates South Dakota courts and law to govern all disputes. In a
suit by a group of Florida consumers against WISP, the court is most likely to rule that
the agreement is, under the principles discussed in “A Sample Court Case, Doe 1 v.
AOL LLC
a. enforceable because there is no reason not to enforce it.
b. enforceable because the parties had equal “bargaining power.
c. unenforceable as a violation of Florida policy and law.
d. unenforceable as a violation of South Dakota policy and law.
By contract, Quality Metals Corporation forbids Resource Refining, Inc., a wholesale
buyer of Qualitys products, from purchasing the products of Qualitys competitors. This
is allowed
a. under any circumstances.
b. unless its effect is to cause a competitor a loss of any business.
c. unless its effect is to substantially lessen competition.
d. unless there is no effect on a competitor.