Jamie is building a house on her lot. She invites Earnie of Earnie’s Excavation to bid on
the excavation job. Earnie observes that the lot next to Jamie’s is also under excavation
and the soil in that lot is normal and not excessively rocky. Based on the assumption
that the soil in Jamie’s lot will be similar, he and Jamie agree that the excavation will
cost $3,000. When Earnie starts digging, he learns there is solid rock under Jamie’s lot.
Earnie says it will cost an extra $2,500 for the excavation work. Jamie agrees just to get
the job done but later refuses to pay a dime more than $3,000. If Earnie sues, the most
likely result would be
a. Jamie wins, as Earnie was under a preexisting duty to dig the basement.
b. Earnie wins as this modification is governed by the UCC and consideration is not
required to enforce a modification of the agreement.
c. Jamie wins as Earnie was not acting in good faith and just wanted to put Jamie in a
situation where she didn’t have a choice but to agree to more money.
d. Earnie wins, as the modification was due to unforeseen difficulties.
Which law imposes controls on federal agencies by requiring basic fairness in areas not
regulated by enabling legislation?
a. The 1964 Civil Rights Act.
b. The Clean Agency Act.
c. The Administrative Procedure Act.
d. The Freedom of Information Act.