Able Co. entered into a contract with Baker Co. for the sale of goods. Both parties are
merchants under the UCC and each party used its own form as an offer and acceptance.
On the reverse of each form, there were minor terms that conflicted with each other.
What is impact of these minor differences in terms in the forms on the contract?
A. There is no contract here because there is a discrepancy between the standard forms
used by the two companies.
B. There is no contract here because there is no “meeting of the minds.”
C. A contract does exist and is favorable to the third party beneficiaries who can take
advantage of the situation.
D. A contract does exist and it includes the terms agreed upon plus gap-fillers from the
UCC.
Abyss handed over a $500 check to Howard Brothers for building him a terrace garden.
The next day, Abyss notices that one part of the garden has not been finished. He calls
his bank to order a stop-payment on the check. When Howard Brothers presents the
check next week, the bank honors it. Which of the following is true in this case?
A. Since Abyss did not give the bank enough time to process a stop-payment order, the
bank is not liable for this loss.
B. The bank is liable to recredit Abyss’s account, since Abyss has suffered a loss by the
bank’s payment.
C. Abyss will not be able to show that he sustained any losses, hence cannot have his
account recredited.
D. The bank is not liable for honoring any checks in good faith that are signed by the
drawer-depositor.
Hagus was a partner at Ace-Star General partnership. The partnership agreement stated
that all partners would continue as partners until the year 2010. However, in 2006,
Hagus was offered another business opportunity that was more attractive than
remaining a partner with Ace-Star. Following this, he dissociated himself from
Ace-Star. Which of the following is true with regard to this situation?
A. Hagus dissolved the Ace-Star General partnership.
B. Hagus used his power to dissociate to withdraw from the partnership.