Determine whether the following instrument is a negotiable instrument, addressing all
the requirements of negotiability in your response.
“I, Orville Wright, promise to pay $5,000 to Billy’s Bicycle Parts in four equal
installments of principal, beginning on January 1, 2012, and on the same day in each of
the next three years. Each payment will consist of $1,250 in principal, plus interest
accrued since the date of this note, in the case of the first payment, or since the prior
payment in the case of all other payments. Interest shall accrue at the rate of 8% per
annum, or in the event of default, at the maximum rate allowed by law until the default
is cured. This note is secured by collateral consisting of various experimental flying
machines. This note may be paid in whole or in part prior to the due dates, and the
interest accrued will be reduced accordingly. The due date for any payment under this
note may be extended by mutual agreement of the parties up to six months from the due
date as stated herein. The proceeds of this note will be used by Orville Wright to further
his aviation experiments, and in the event those experiments are unsuccessful, the
payment obligation is canceled.
Signed: Orville Wright
Date: 1/1/11
Many laws require a determination of actual injury before liability or guilt is
determined. Is it fair that under the Clayton Act, a merger may be prevented merely
because the merger is “likely” to substantially lessen competition or create a monopoly?
Even if you do not agree with this regulation, why do you think it was enacted?