V3 was a successful singing group that contracted to perform at the “Metalsubstance”
rock concert. V3 was aware that the promoter would sustain a substantial loss if the
group failed to perform. The members of the group were stricken with a virus that
confined them to their beds. The promoter sued for breach of contract. What is the
probable result?
a. V3 is liable for damages for breach of contract.
b. The contract was discharged by impossibility of performance.
c. In order to avoid liability for breach of contract, V3 must arrange for another group
of comparable quality and reputation to perform on the scheduled date.
d. V3 will be deemed to have substantially performed the contract.
Under Article 2 of the UCC, in a situation where it is clear that the parties intended a
contract, but a term in the acceptance conflicts with a term in the offer:
a. there is no contract.
b. the acceptance is viewed entirely as a counteroffer.
c. there is a contract for the terms of the offer and acceptance that are consistent, but the
conflicting terms cancel out.
d. there is a contract, and the conflicting term in the offer is part of the contract.