Curtis filed a lawsuit against Ulhoff for failure to repay $1,000 according to the terms
of a promissory note. The trial ended before it began, with the trial judge granting a
motion for summary judgment in favor of Curtis. Ulhoff has appealed, and the Supreme
Court of Iowa has remanded the case. This means:
a. Curtis automatically wins because he won in the lower court.
b. Ulhoff automatically wins because he lost in the lower court.
c. Neither party wins because the case is being thrown out.
d. We don’t know who wins yet because the case is being returned to the trial court for
additional steps.
Crytrin Manufacturing, Inc. contracted with Molfrey, Inc. to manufacture three large
pieces of equipment. The contract contained a clause stating that Crytrin agreed to
repair or replace any defective equipment, but that was the only remedy Molfry would
have. This clause:
a. is an effective disclaimer.
b. will not keep Molfry from obtaining consequential damages since, under the UCC,
consequential damages cannot be excluded.
c. is a limitation of remedy clause, which limits or excludes normal remedies permitted
under the Code.
d. limits any express warranties made by Crytrin.