6) Which of the following does NOT represent an increased opportunity to commit
fraud?
A) Related Party Transactions
B) the company founder is the CEO and Chairman of the Board
C) the financial statements involve accounting estimates
D) the company is a new audit client for the CPA firm
7) Each of the following situations involves a possible violation of the rule on
independence. For each situation, (1) decide whether the Code of Professional Conduct
has been violated, and (2) briefly explain how the situation violates (or does not violate)
the Code of Professional Conduct.
a. Harry Brown is a partner in the Topeka office of Hedley & Co., CPAs. Harry’s
brother is employed in an audit-sensitive position by Jensen Appliances, a publicly held
company in Kansas. Jensen Appliances is one of Hedley & Co.’s audit clients. Neither
Harry nor personnel from the Topeka office is involved in the audit of Jensen.
Violation? Yes No
Explanation:
b. John Woods is an audit manager with Calden & Co., CPAs, a one-office CPA firm.
John owns 100 shares of common stock in one of the firm’s audit clients, but he does
not provide any audit or non-audit services to the company.
Violation? Yes No
Explanation:
c. The accounting firm of Fine & Herman, CPAs, provides bookkeeping and tax
services for Henderson Corporation, a privately held company. Fine & Herman also
performs the annual audit of Henderson Corporation.
Violation? Yes No
Explanation:
d. Bob Shelton CPA, is the auditor of Cafe Ecko. A couple of weeks ago, Cafe Ecko’s
management commenced litigation against Bob, alleging he was negligent in last year’s
audit.
Violation? Yes No
Explanation:
e. Hamilton Appliance has not paid Karen Linwood, CPA, her audit fee for the past two
years. Karen is starting work on the current year’s audit of Hamilton.
Violation? Yes No
Explanation: