C.the auditor was negligent, but the plaintiff suffered no real damages.
D.the plaintiff was an unforeseen third-party user of the financial report.
The property portfolio of Utopia Pty Ltd is stated at a value of $1 000 000 in excess of
its current market value. Utopia Pty Ltd is a non-reporting entity and does not apply the
provisions of AASB 1010 in the preparation of its financial report. The directors believe
that it would be inappropriate to write the properties down to market value as it is their
intention to hold the properties as a long-term investment and the properties will
eventually recover their value. The independent valuer agrees that the property will
eventually recover its full value. Sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support the
value of the property would include obtaining a letter of representation from
management confirming:
A.the directors’ intention to hold the property on a long-term basis, that the value of the
buildings is likely to increase in the long term and that the company is indeed a
non-reporting entity.
B.the directors’ intention to hold the property on a long-term basis and that the company
is indeed a non-reporting entity.
C.the intention to hold the property on a long-term basis.
D.the company is indeed a non-reporting entity.
When the auditor has assessed the level of control risk at less than high, the auditor
should document:
A.both that conclusion and the understanding of the entity’s internal control elements
obtained to plan the audit.