Ashley Mayor Susan Kane was once again caught with egg on her face last week as she and her
financial advisers tried to defend that riddle. On one hand, Comptroller Jim Guan [a Kane appointee],
explaining $75 million in assets the mayor [Kane] hopes to hold in reserve in the 2013 Ashley city
budget, testified in hearings that the city had actually ended 2011 with a $6 million surplus, not the
much-reported deficit. He said further that the modest surplus grew to $54 million as a result of
tax-enrichment supplements to the 2011 balance sheet.
On the other hand, the mayor stuck by the same guns she used last year on her predecessor. The city
had ended 2011, under the Allen Ross administration, not merely without a surplus, but with a deficit.
The apparent discrepancy can be explained.
Like most U.S. cities, Ashley operates under a modified accrual accounting basis. This is a
combination of the cash basis and the accrual basis. The modified accrual basis differs from the
accrual basis in that revenue is recorded when it is collected. The collection of Ashley’s parking tax,
which is assessed on all city parking lots and garages, is an example.
The tax is assessed and collected on a quarterly basis but the city doesn’t collect the amount due for the
last quarter of 2012 until the first quarter of 2013. Under ideal accrual methods, the parking revenues
should be recorded in the 2012 financial statements. Under a cash approach, the revenues would be
recorded in the 2013 budget. What the city did before was to record the money whenever it was
advantageous politically. That, combined with the infamous revolving funds, allowed the city to hide
the fact that it was running large deficits under [former] Mayor Ross. That also means that no one
really knew where the city stood.
The auditors are now reallocating the parking revenues to the 2013 budget but are accruing other
revenues by shifting the period of collection from a year in the past. Overall, more revenues were
moved into earlier fiscal years than into later years, inflating those budgets. Thus, the 2013 deficit is a
surplus.
The article concluded:
The upshot is that both Mayor Kane and Mr. Guan [the comptroller] were correct. There was a deficit
in the 2011 corporate or checkbook fund, but because of corrections taking place now, a surplus exists.
a. Do you agree with the way the auditors handled parking revenues? Support your answer by
explaining which method of accounting you think a city should use.
b. Comment on the statement, “Systematically applied accounting principles will allow all to know
exactly where the city stands.”