5) The Arlington Company prepared a common-size income statement to compare its results with its key competitor,
Bardo Company. Please refer to the following data:
Arlington Co. Bardo Co.
Revenues 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of goods sold 42.1% 47.8%
Gross Profit 57.9% 52.2%
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing expense 26.3% 8.6%
General and administrative expense 12.0% 10.8%
Research and development expense 4.1% 10.2%
Total operating expenses 42.4% 29.6%
Income before income tax 15.5% 22.6%
Income tax expense 3.3% 5.8%
Net income (loss) 12.3% 16.8%
Based on this data, an analyst could conclude that Arlington’s total gross profit is higher than Bardo’s.
6) The Arlington Company prepared a common-size income statement to compare its results with its key competitor,
Bardo Company. Please refer to the following data:
Arlington Co. Bardo Co.
Revenues 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of goods sold 42.1% 47.8%
Gross Profit 57.9% 52.2%
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing expense 26.3% 8.6%
General and administrative expense 12.0% 10.8%
Research and development expense 4.1% 10.2%
Total operating expenses 42.4% 29.6%
Income before income tax 15.5% 22.6%
Income tax expense 3.3% 5.8%
Net income (loss) 12.3% 16.8%
Based on this data, an analyst could conclude that Arlington’s performance is not as good as Bardo’s because it has
much higher sales and marketing expenses.