37) If Ziggy Company concluded that an investment originally classified as held to maturity
would now more appropriately be classified as available for sale, Ziggy would:
A) Not reclassify the investment, as original classifications are irrevocable.
B) Reclassify the investment as available for sale and immediately recognize in net income any
unrealized holding gain or loss on the reclassification date.
C) Reclassify the investment as available for sale and immediately recognize in accumulated
other comprehensive income any unrealized holding gain or loss on the reclassification date.
D) Need to restate earnings, as the original classification was in error.
38) If Dizbert Company concluded that an investment originally classified as available for sale
would now more appropriately be classified as held to maturity, Dizbert would:
A) Not reclassify the investment, as original classifications are irrevocable.
B) Reclassify the investment as held to maturity and immediately recognize in net income any
unrealized holding gain or loss on the reclassification date.
C) Reclassify the investment as held to maturity and treat the fair value as of the date of
reclassification as the investment’s amortized cost basis for future amortization.
D) Need to restate earnings, as the original classification was in error.