the exercise price of the options is set to equal the market price of the underlying stock
on the grant date. Clearly, executives would prefer to be granted options when the stock
price (and thus the exercise price) is at its lowest. Backdating options is the practice of
choosing a past date when the market price was particularly low. Backdating has not, in
the past, been illegal if no documents are forged, if communicated to the shareholders,
and if properly reflected in earnings and in taxes.
1>Since backdating gives the executive an instant profit, why wouldnt the firm simply
grant an option with the exercise price lower than the cur-rent current market price?
2>Suppose the executive was not involved in back-dating backdating the ESOs. Does
the executive face any ethical issues?
7) The following information regarding the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, was drawn
from the accounts and records of the Johnson County general fund:
Revenues and other asset inflows:
Property taxes$6,000,000
Licenses and permits750,000
State grants150,000
Collection of interfund advance to other fund80,000
Proceeds from sale of equipment 40,000
Expenditures and other asset outflows:
General government $2,250,000
Public safety1,130,000
Judicial system600,000
Health900,000
Equipment purchases370,000
Payment to debt service fund to cover future debt
service on general government bonds 570,000
Total fund balance, July 1, 2013$1,200,000
Required:
Prepare a statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance for the
Johnson County general fund for the year ended June 30, 2014.