Ritz Corporation wished to acquire the stock of Stale, Inc. In conjunction with its plan
of acquisition, Ritz hired Fein, CPA, to audit the financial statements of Stale. Based on
the audited financial statements and Fein’s unqualified opinion, Ritz acquired Stale.
Within 6 months, it was discovered that the inventory of Stale had been overstated by
$500,000. Ritz commenced an action against Fein. Ritz believes that Fein failed to
exercise the knowledge, skill, and judgment commonly possessed by CPAs in the
locality, but is not able to prove that Fein either intentionally deceived it or showed a
reckless disregard for the truth. Ritz also is unable to prove that Fein had any
knowledge that the inventory was overstated. Which of the following two causes of
action would provide Ritz with proper bases upon which Ritz would most likely
prevail?
A. Negligence and breach of contract.
B. Negligence and gross negligence.
C. Negligence and fraud.
D. Gross negligence and breach of contract.
All of the following can assist the auditor in testing the existence assertion for
investment securities except:
A. physical examination.
B. comparing fair value to cost.
C. confirmation with the issuer.
D. confirmation with the custodian.