GG Inc. uses LIFO. GG disclosed that if FIFO had been used, inventory at the end of
2013 would have been $15 million higher than the difference between LIFO and FIFO
at the end of 2012. Assuming GG has a 40% income tax rate: A. Its reported cost of
goods sold for 2013 would have been $9 million higher if it had used FIFO rather than
LIFO for its financial statements.
B. Its reported cost of goods sold for 2013 would have been $15 million higher if it had
used FIFO rather than LIFO for its financial statements.
C. Its reported net income for 2013 would have been $9 million higher if it had used
FIFO rather than LIFO for its financial statements.
D. Its reported net income for 2013 would have been $15 million higher if it had used
FIFO rather than LIFO for its financial statements.
Answer:
If Dinsburry Company concluded that an investment originally classified as a trading
security would now more appropriately be classified as held to maturity, Dinsburry
would: A. Not reclassify the investment, as original classifications are irrevocable.
B. Reclassify the investment as held to maturity and immediately recognize in net
income all unrealized gains and losses that have not already been recognized as of the
reclassification date.