Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
42. LaPango Inc. estimates that its average-risk projects have a WACC of 10%, its below-average risk projects have a
WACC of 8%, and its above-average risk projects have a WACC of 12%. Which of the following projects (A, B, and C)
should the company accept?
a. Project B, which is of below-average risk and has a return of 8.5%.
b. Project C, which is of above-average risk and has a return of 11%.
c. Project A, which is of average risk and has a return of 9%.
d. None of the projects should be accepted.
e. All of the projects should be accepted.
43. Norris Enterprises, an all-equity firm, has a beta of 2.0. The chief financial officer is evaluating a project with an
expected return of 14%, before any risk adjustment. The risk-free rate is 5%, and the market risk premium is 4%. The
project being evaluated is riskier than the firm’s average project, in terms of both its beta risk and its total risk. Which of
the following statements is CORRECT?
a. The project should definitely be accepted because its expected return (before any risk adjustments) is greater than
its required return.
b. The project should definitely be rejected because its expected return (before risk adjustment) is less than its
required return.
c. Riskier-than-average projects should have their expected returns increased to reflect their higher risk. Clearly, this
would make the project acceptable regardless of the amount of the adjustment.
d. The accept/reject decision depends on the firm’s risk-adjustment policy. If Norris’ policy is to increase the
required return on a riskier-than-average project to 3% over rs, then it should reject the project.
e. Capital budgeting projects should be evaluated solely on the basis of their total risk. Thus, insufficient
information has been provided to make the accept/reject decision.