4. What are agenda-setting and the cultivation effect?
Agenda-setting is a key phenomenon posited by contemporary media effects
researchers. It is the idea that when the mass media focus their attention on particular
events or issues, they determine—that is, set the agenda for—the major topics of
discussion for individuals and society. Essentially, agenda-setting researchers have
argued that the mass media do not so much tell us what to think as what to think
about.
The cultivation effect suggests that heavy viewing of television leads individuals to
perceive the world in ways that are consistent with television portrayals. This area of
media effects research has pushed researchers beyond a focus on how the media
affects individual behavior toward larger ideas about the impact on perception.
5. What is the spiral of silence? In what kinds of circumstances might the theorized effects not
occur?
Developed by German communication theorist Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann in the
1970s and 1980s, the spiral of silence theory links the mass media, social
psychology, and the formation of public opinion. The theory proposes that those who
believe that their views on controversial issues are in the minority will keep their
views to themselves—that is, become silent—for fear of social isolation. This can
diminish or even silence alternative perspectives. The theory is based on social
psychology studies. According to the theory, the mass media can help create a false,
overrated majority; that is, a true majority of people holding a certain position can
grow silent when they sense an opposing majority in the media. You can see the
spiral of silence in President Donald Trump’s followers. Those who held certain
“politically incorrect” views hid in the shadows until Trump gave them permission to
be vocal through his racist rhetoric. Some people may fail to fall into a spiral of
silence either because they don’t watch or listen to the media or because they
mistakenly perceive that more people hold their position than really do.
6. The media helps make sense of the world. It changes our culture, and we are changed by it.
The media also changes our history, politics, and economics. Provide examples from the
textbook and by searching the web.
In the United States in the 1960s, an important body of research, loosely labeled
cultural studies, came about to challenge mainstream media effects theories. Since
that time, cultural studies research has focused on how people make meaning,
understand reality, and order experience by using symbols that appear in the media.
For example, the focus on Hillary Clinton’s e-mails changed how the public viewed
her. The way the news outlet shaped the stories had a major impact on the outcome.
Also, many people were influenced by Russian interference in the election through
fake accounts on Facebook and Twitter.