Page 52
Many impoverished nations struggle with diseases like malaria. How would reduction or
elimination of malaria contribute to long-run economic growth?
Fifty years ago, East Asia, Latin America, and Africa were all relatively poor areas.
Why did East Asia have fairly rapid growth in real GDP per capita, while economic
growth in Latin America and Africa was generally low?
Suppose that fossil fuels become much scarcer in the next 50 years. With a growing
global demand for energy and the looming threat of rising global temperatures, it would
seem to be a recipe for a dramatic decrease in the growth rate of economic activity. Why
do many economists believe that economies can continue to grow, even in the face of
resource scarcity?
Use the following to answer questions 281-282:
(Figure: Nations A and B) Use Figure: Nations A and B. Suppose that, in 1960, each
nation had $100 of physical capital for each worker and in 2010 each nation had $400 of
physical capital per worker. Compute the growth of real GDP per capita for both
nations.
(Figure: Nations A and B) Use Figure: Nations A and B. Suppose that, in 1960, each
nation had $100 of physical capital for each worker and in 2010 each nation had $400 of
physical capital per worker. Clearly, in both 1960 and in 2010, nation A was producing
more real output per capita with the same amount of physical capital per worker. What
could explain the difference in these aggregate production functions?