In Techland, from 1980 to 2010, holding technology and human capital fixed,
increasing physical capital per worker from $25,000 to $100,000 would have led to a
doubling of real GDP per worker, from $40,000 to $80,000. However, not only did
physical capital per worker increase from $25,000 to $100,000, but technological
progress shifted the productivity curve upward so that real GDP per worker actually
increased from $40,000 to $320,000. What was the annual growth rate of real GDP per
capita in Techland?
In Techland, from 1980 to 2010, holding technology and human capital fixed,
increasing physical capital per worker from $25,000 to $100,000 would have led to a
doubling of real GDP per worker, from $40,000 to $80,000. However, not only did
physical capital per worker increase from $25,000 to $100,000, but technological
progress shifted the productivity curve upward so that real GDP per worker actually
increased from $40,000 to $320,000. What share of the annual growth rate of real GDP
per capita was attributable to increasing physical capital per worker?
In Techland, from 1980 to 2010, holding technology and human capital fixed,
increasing physical capital per worker from $25,000 to $100,000 would have led to a
doubling of real GDP per worker, from $40,000 to $80,000. However, not only did
physical capital per worker increase from $25,000 to $100,000, but technological
progress shifted the productivity curve upward so that real GDP per worker actually
increased from $40,000 to $320,000. What share of the annual growth rate of real GDP
per capita was attributable to higher total factor productivity?