Page 6
(Figure: Guns and Butter) Use Figure: Guns and Butter. If the economy is operating at
point B, producing 16 guns and 12 pounds of butter per period, a decision to move to
point E and produce 18 pounds of butter:
indicates that you can have more butter and guns simultaneously.
makes it clear that this economy has decreasing opportunity costs.
necessitates a loss of 8 guns per period.
necessitates a loss of 4 guns per period.
(Figure: Guns and Butter) Use Figure: Guns and Butter. The combination of guns and
butter at point H:
can be attained but would cost too much.
cannot be attained, given the level of technology and the factors of production
available.
has no meaning since it does not relate to the preferences of consumers.
is attainable but would increase unemployment.
(Figure: Guns and Butter) Use Figure: Guns and Butter. Suppose the economy produced
8 guns and 12 pounds of butter per period. Given that, which statement is TRUE?
This is a possible choice, but it is inefficient.
This combination invalidates the notion of increasing opportunity cost.
The economy is still efficient but does not buy as much as it could.
Something must be done to reduce the amount of employment.
If an economy has to sacrifice only one unit of good X for each unit of good Y produced
throughout the relevant range, then its production possibility frontier has a(n):
increasing negative slope.
decreasing negative slope.
A production possibility frontier that is a straight line sloping down from left to right
suggests that:
more of both goods could be produced moving along the frontier.
the two products must have the same price.
the opportunity costs of the products are constant.
there are no opportunity costs.