Two large universities, Humongous State (HSU) and Behemoth State (BSU), dominate
college basketball. Each basketball program aggressively recruits the best athletes to
attend the university, but the best athletes can skip college and jump immediately to
professional basketball. Each school has two options: they can either illegally pay top
players to enroll and thus increase the winning percentage of the team, or they can
follow the rules and lose the top players to the professional ranks. The table shows the
payoff matrix of winning percentages that each school would achieve based on its
recruiting decision, given the recruiting decision of its rival. Winning percentages in
each cell of the payoff matrix are given as (HSU, BSU).
A) What is the noncooperative Nash equilibrium?
B) Suppose each school considers the future and devises a tit-for-tat strategy. Neither
school will pay players to play basketball so long as the other does not. If one school
breaks the agreement and pays players, the other school will do the same until the first
school stops paying players. If both schools adopt the tit-for-tat strategy, what are the
winning percentages every year? Will this be effective at eliminating the illegal practice
of paying college athletes to play basketball?
Suppose two gas stations operate at the same busy intersection. You notice that the
posted prices are almost always the same. Assuming that these firms are engaged in tacit
price collusion, can we automatically conclude that there is no competition for
customers between the two stations?
made up of few firms, each with some market power and therefore aware of their
interdependence with the other firms.
composed of many buyers and sellers, all of whom are price takers.
that are the same as monopolistically competitive industries, except that they sell a
standardized product.