Page 59
(Figure: Kristin’s Budget Line) Use Figure Kristin’s Budget Line. The price of a cup of
cappuccino is $3, and the price of an apple is $1. Suppose Kristin initially consumes 10
cups of cappuccino and 30 apples. Then the price of apples increases to $3 each and the
price of a cappuccino remains unchanged. As a result of this price change, Kristin’s
optimal consumption bundle changes, reflected by a decrease in the consumption of
both apples and cappuccinos. This suggests that:
apples are a Giffen good.
cappuccino is a Giffen good.
both apples and cappuccino are normal goods.
apples are an inferior good.
(Figure: Kristin’s Budget Line) Use Figure Kristin’s Budget Line. The price of a cup of
cappuccino is $3, and the price of an apple is $1. Suppose Kristin initially consumes 10
cups of cappuccino and 30 apples. Then, the price of apples increases to $3 each and the
price of cappuccino remains unchanged. As a result of the price change, Kristin’s
optimal consumption bundle changes, reflected by a decrease in the consumption of
both apples and cappuccinos. If Kristin is to maintain the same level of utility as before
the price change, she must:
keep her income the same, since only one good’s price changed.
increase her income by $2.
(Figure: Kristin’s Budget Line) Use Figure Kristin’s Budget Line. The price of a cup of
cappuccino is $3, and the price of an apple is $1. Suppose Kristin initially consumes 10
cups of cappuccino and 30 apples. Then the price of apples increases to $3 each and the
price of cappuccino remains unchanged. As a result of this price change, Kristin’s
optimal consumption bundle is now 9 cups of cappuccino and 11 apples. If Kristin’s
income could be adjusted so that she could maintain her initial level of utility after the
price change, she would consume more cappuccino and more apples. This reflects:
a substitution effect from the price change and an income effect from the income
change.
the substitution effect alone.
neither a substitution nor an income effect.