Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 1
1. Special needs searches include all of the following characteristics, except:
a.
they can result in criminal prosecution and conviction.
b.
they don’t require warrants or probable cause.
c.
they are directed at people generally, not at criminal suspects or defendants specifically.
d.
their reasonableness depends entirely on protecting invasions of individual privacy.
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Chapter Introduction
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.01 – Understand that special needs searches are directed at people
generally, can result in criminal prosecution, and don’t require warrants or probable cause.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 2:58 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 12:29 PM
2. Which of the following is not considered a special needs search?
a.
an inventory search
b.
a prenatal patient drug search
c.
a hot pursuit search
d.
an airport search
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Chapter Introduction
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.01 – Understand that special needs searches are directed at people
generally, can result in criminal prosecution, and don’t require warrants or probable cause.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 3:43 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
3. According to U.S. v. Ramsey (1977), searches at international borders are:
a.
b.
c.
d.
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
International Border Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.03 – Know that the special need of the United States to control who and
what comes into its borders makes international border searches reasonable without warrants
or probable cause. Appreciate that some objective basis is required to justify strip and body
cavity searches.
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 2
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 3:55 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
4. In South Dakota v. Opperman (1976), SCOTUS held that the Vermillion, South Dakota, police department conducted
reasonable Fourth Amendment searches when they used:
a.
container search procedures.
b.
inventory search procedures.
c.
border search procedures.
d.
pretrial search procedures.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Inventory Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.02 – Know that following routine, department-approved procedures
allows law enforcement to conduct inventory and container searches without probable cause
or warrants to protect the owners’ belongings, to prevent lawsuits against law enforcement
departments, and to protect law enforcement agents.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:02 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
5. Law enforcement officers take inventories to satisfy three government interests that aren’t directly connected to
searching for evidence of a crime. Which of the following is not one of those three government interests?
a.
To protect owners’ personal property while they, or their vehicles or other containers, are in police custody.
b.
To protect owners from false accusations while in police custody.
c.
To protect law enforcement agencies against lawsuits for the loss, destruction, or theft of owners’ property.
d.
To protect law enforcement officers, detained suspects, and offenders from the danger of bombs, weapons, and
illegal drugs that might be hidden in owners’ property.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Inventory Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.02 – Know that following routine, department-approved procedures
allows law enforcement to conduct inventory and container searches without probable cause
or warrants to protect the owners’ belongings, to prevent lawsuits against law enforcement
departments, and to protect law enforcement agents.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:10 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
6. In South Dakota v. Opperman (1976), the police conducted an inventory search in which they searched Opperman’s car
after towing it to an impound lot because it was parked illegally. They found marijuana during a search of the glove
compartment. SCOTUS decided that the search of the glove compartment:
a.
violated the U.S. Constitution, because it did not use the least intrusive means to secure the drugs.
b.
did not violate the U.S. Constitution, because it was a legitimate inventory search.
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 3
c.
violated the U.S. Constitution, because it was conducted on a suspicion that drugs were in Opperman’s glove
compartment.
d.
did not violate the U.S. Constitution, because drugs were discovered in the glove compartment.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Inventory Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.02 – Know that following routine, department-approved procedures
allows law enforcement to conduct inventory and container searches without probable cause
or warrants to protect the owners’ belongings, to prevent lawsuits against law enforcement
departments, and to protect law enforcement agents.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:15 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
7. According to SCOTUS, searches at international borders are reasonable:
a.
only if based on probable cause.
b.
only with a warrant.
c.
only if based on reasonable suspicion.
d.
without warrants, probable cause, or reasonable suspicion.
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
International Border Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.03 – Know that the special need of the United States to control who and
what comes into its borders makes international border searches reasonable without warrants
or probable cause. Appreciate that some objective basis is required to justify strip and body
cavity searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:20 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
8. Joan Smith is entering the United States at the Canadian border. Officers have reasonable suspicion to believe she is
smuggling drugs. Which of the following searches of Joan may the officers lawfully conduct?
a.
A routine border search, a strip search of her person, a search of her handbag, and a body cavity search.
b.
Only a routine border search and a search of her handbag.
c.
A routine border search, a strip search of her person, and a search of her handbag.
d.
Only a routine border search.
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
International Border Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.03 – Know that the special need of the United States to control who and
what comes into its borders makes international border searches reasonable without warrants
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 4
or probable cause. Appreciate that some objective basis is required to justify strip and body
cavity searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:24 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
9. What type of search involves searching prisoners, probationers, and parolees, as well as visitors and employees of
prisons and jails, to control contraband?
a.
an inventory search
b.
a custody-related search
c.
a border search
d.
an inspection search
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Custody-Related Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.05 – Appreciate that the special needs to maintain safety, security, and
discipline over people locked up in jails and prisons, probationers, and parolees outweigh the
reduced expectation of privacy that society grants to people in the custody of the criminal
justice system. Understand that individuals can be subject to these special needs searches
before being convicted of a crime.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:28 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
10. With regard to border searches, SCOTUS has found that:
a.
any kind of border search can be made without any justification whatsoever.
b.
strip searches must be justified by probable cause.
c.
body cavity searches are never justified.
d.
the national interest in controlling the nation’s borders outweighs the invasion of privacy caused by routine
border searches.
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
International Border Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.03 – Know that the special need of the United States to control who and
what comes into its borders makes international border searches reasonable without warrants
or probable cause. Appreciate that some objective basis is required to justify strip and body
cavity searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:33 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
11. In determining the reasonableness of airport searches, courts have:
a.
not ruled on this matter.
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 5
b.
held that they entail minimal intrusions that apply to all passengers.
c.
considered them to be private searches.
d.
held that airports may conduct them to protect public safety, but the fruits of the searches are inadmissible at a
criminal trial.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Airport Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.03 – Know that the special need of the United States to control who and
what comes into its borders makes international border searches reasonable without warrants
or probable cause. Appreciate that some objective basis is required to justify strip and body
cavity searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:38 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
12. Which of the following special needs searches applies only to prisoners, probationers, parolees, pretrial releasees, and
visitors and employees of prisons and jails?
a.
airport searches
b.
inventory searches
c.
drug testing
d.
custody-related searches
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Chapter Introduction
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.01 – Understand that special needs searches are directed at people
generally, can result in criminal prosecution, and don’t require warrants or probable cause.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:44 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
13. Which of the following is not one of the three theories courts use to explain why probationers and parolees have
diminished Fourth Amendment privacy rights?
a.
They’re still in state custody—conditional release is a privilege, not a right.
b.
Searches of probationers and parolees are consent searches and seizures, agreed to in their signed “contract” of
release.
c.
They have diminished rights to promote the safety and security of probation and parole officers.
d.
Courts use a balancing approach, which considers the government’s interest in protecting society and reducing
recidivism, versus privacy and the right against unreasonable searches and seizures.
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Custody-Related Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.05 – Appreciate that the special needs to maintain safety, security, and
discipline over people locked up in jails and prisons, probationers, and parolees outweigh the
reduced expectation of privacy that society grants to people in the custody of the criminal
justice system. Understand that individuals can be subject to these special needs searches
before being convicted of a crime.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:49 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
14. Historically, before the second half of the twentieth century, U.S. prisoners:
a.
had almost no rights under the Constitution.
b.
were fully protected by the Constitution.
c.
were protected by the Constitution if they plead guilty.
d.
were protected by the Fourth Amendment in the privacy of their cells.
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Custody-Related Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.05 – Appreciate that the special needs to maintain safety, security, and
discipline over people locked up in jails and prisons, probationers, and parolees outweigh the
reduced expectation of privacy that society grants to people in the custody of the criminal
justice system. Understand that individuals can be subject to these special needs searches
before being convicted of a crime.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:53 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
15. In Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, SCOTUS (5–4) decided that strip searching Albert Florence before he
entered the general jail population was:
a.
not reasonable, because it was a minor offense.
b.
reasonable, because he had contraband.
c.
not reasonable, due to a lack of reasonable suspicion.
d.
reasonable, based on Florence’s behavior.
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Custody-Related Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.05 – Appreciate that the special needs to maintain safety, security, and
discipline over people locked up in jails and prisons, probationers, and parolees outweigh the
reduced expectation of privacy that society grants to people in the custody of the criminal
justice system. Understand that individuals can be subject to these special needs searches
before being convicted of a crime.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 5:01 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 7
16. Frank is an inmate at Greensburg State Prison, and he has just had a contact visit with an old friend. Before Frank
returns to his cell, prison guards subject Frank to a strip search. Such a search is:
a.
constitutional, because prisoners have a diminished expectation of privacy and there is an important
government need to maintain prison security.
b.
constitutional, because prisoners forfeit all Fourth Amendment rights.
c.
unconstitutional, unless prison officials have reasonable suspicion to think they will find contraband or other
evidence of a crime on Frank.
d.
unconstitutional, unless prison officials have probable cause to think they will find contraband or other
evidence of a crime on Frank.
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Custody-Related Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.05 – Appreciate that the special needs to maintain safety, security, and
discipline over people locked up in jails and prisons, probationers, and parolees outweigh the
reduced expectation of privacy that society grants to people in the custody of the criminal
justice system. Understand that individuals can be subject to these special needs searches
before being convicted of a crime.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 5:04 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 12:31 PM
17. With regard to a prisoner’s expectation of privacy, the court has ruled that prisoners have:
a.
rights to privacy equal to those of a free man.
b.
absolutely no rights to privacy whatsoever.
c.
a substantially reduced expectation of privacy.
d.
only those rights that are given at the discretion of the prison administration.
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Custody-Related Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.05 – Appreciate that the special needs to maintain safety, security, and
discipline over people locked up in jails and prisons, probationers, and parolees outweigh the
reduced expectation of privacy that society grants to people in the custody of the criminal
justice system. Understand that individuals can be subject to these special needs searches
before being convicted of a crime.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 5:09 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
18. In Norris v. Premier Integrity Solutions, Inc. (2011), the Sixth Circuit Court held that certain individuals had a
diminished expectation of privacy. To which type of individual did the court refer?
a.
a pre-trial detainee who has consented to drug testing
b.
a student enrolled in college
c.
an inmate in prison
d.
a probationer under supervision
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 8
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Custody-Related Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.05 – Appreciate that the special needs to maintain safety, security, and
discipline over people locked up in jails and prisons, probationers, and parolees outweigh the
reduced expectation of privacy that society grants to people in the custody of the criminal
justice system. Understand that individuals can be subject to these special needs searches
before being convicted of a crime.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 5:14 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
19. The leading SCOTUS cases regarding the Fourth Amendment and drug testing involve all of the following settings,
except:
a.
employees in the workplace.
b.
citizens in airports.
c.
pregnant patients in hospitals.
d.
students in high schools and colleges.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Drug Testing
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.07 – Understand and appreciate how SCOTUS has applied the balancing
ideal to drug testing of (1) employees in the workplace, (2) pregnant women in hospitals, and
(3) high school students.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 5:16 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
20. In what case did SCOTUS hold that a student may be searched at school, based on reasonable suspicion rather than
probable cause (due to the school’s need to maintain a healthy learning environment)?
a.
Vernonia School District v. Acton
b.
Board of Education v. Earls
c.
New Jersey v. T.L.O.
d.
Commonwealth v. Nielson
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Drug Testing
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.07 – Understand and appreciate how SCOTUS has applied the balancing
ideal to drug testing of (1) employees in the workplace, (2) pregnant women in hospitals, and
(3) high school students.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 9
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 5:20 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
21. Full body, strip, and body cavity searches of jail inmates are reasonable without either warrants or probable cause
under certain circumstances. What are those circumstances?
a.
Only if, in the particular situation, the need for security outweighs prisoners’ reasonable expectation of
privacy.
b.
Only if, in the particular situation, the need for safety outweighs prisoners’ reasonable expectation of privacy.
c.
Only if, in the particular situation, the need for discipline outweighs prisoners’ reasonable expectation of
privacy.
d.
If, in the particular situation, the need for security, safety, or discipline outweighs prisoners’ reasonable
expectation of privacy.
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Custody-Related Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.05 – Appreciate that the special needs to maintain safety, security, and
discipline over people locked up in jails and prisons, probationers, and parolees outweigh the
reduced expectation of privacy that society grants to people in the custody of the criminal
justice system. Understand that individuals can be subject to these special needs searches
before being convicted of a crime.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 5:26 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
22. In Ferguson v. City of Charleston (2001), involving state hospital obstetric patients who were arrested for child abuse
after testing positive for cocaine while pregnant, SCOTUS decided that the searches:
a.
did violate the Fourth Amendment, because they were warrantless, suspicionless, and nonconsensual.
b.
did not violate the Fourth Amendment, because the incidence of cocaine use among pregnant women has
created a special need.
c.
did not violate the Fourth Amendment, because doctors suspected the mothers were using cocaine.
d.
did violate the Fourth Amendment, because they were conducted by health care professionals and not by law
enforcement officers.
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Drug Testing
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.07 – Understand and appreciate how SCOTUS has applied the balancing
ideal to drug testing of (1) employees in the workplace, (2) pregnant women in hospitals, and
(3) high school students.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 5:44 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
23. Although SCOTUS has not ruled on this issue, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld Georgia’s statute,
which requires mandatory testing and storage of DNA for what population?
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 10
a.
incarcerated felons
b.
incarcerated sex offenders
c.
sex offenders in the community
d.
jailed inmates
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Custody-Related Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.05 – Appreciate that the special needs to maintain safety, security, and
discipline over people locked up in jails and prisons, probationers, and parolees outweigh the
reduced expectation of privacy that society grants to people in the custody of the criminal
justice system. Understand that individuals can be subject to these special needs searches
before being convicted of a crime.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 5:49 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
24. To do a body cavity search at an international border, which of the following is needed?
a.
probable cause
b.
reasonable suspicion
c.
individualized suspicion
d.
a written set of procedures
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
International Border Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.03 – Know that the special need of the United States to control who and
what comes into its borders makes international border searches reasonable without warrants
or probable cause. Appreciate that some objective basis is required to justify strip and body
cavity searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 5:55 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
25. In Samson v. California (2006), SCOTUS expanded the ruling from U.S. v. Knights, holding that law enforcement
officers can search parolees’ homes:
a.
only with reasonable suspicion.
b.
without either warrants or individualized reasonable suspicion.
c.
only with warrants.
d.
only with probable cause.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Custody-Related Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.05 – Appreciate that the special needs to maintain safety, security, and
discipline over people locked up in jails and prisons, probationers, and parolees outweigh the
reduced expectation of privacy that society grants to people in the custody of the criminal
justice system. Understand that individuals can be subject to these special needs searches
before being convicted of a crime.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 5:58 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
26. DNA testing of incarcerated felons:
a.
has been declared unconstitutional by the courts that have considered it.
b.
has been found to be constitutional by SCOTUS.
c.
has been found to be constitutional by the courts of appeal that have considered it.
d.
has not yet been addressed in any court opinions.
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Custody-Related Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.05 – Appreciate that the special needs to maintain safety, security, and
discipline over people locked up in jails and prisons, probationers, and parolees outweigh the
reduced expectation of privacy that society grants to people in the custody of the criminal
justice system. Understand that individuals can be subject to these special needs searches
before being convicted of a crime.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 6:00 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
27. According to the SCOTUS decision in New Jersey v. T.L.O., involving the search of a student’s purse, school officials
(at least those officials supervising students younger than high-school age) may search the possessions of a student under
their authority:
a.
only with a search warrant.
b.
based on probable cause that the student has broken the law or a school regulation.
c.
based on reasonable suspicion alone.
d.
without a warrant, at any time, for any reason, and without individualized suspicion.
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Drug Testing
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.07 – Understand and appreciate how SCOTUS has applied the balancing
ideal to drug testing of (1) employees in the workplace, (2) pregnant women in hospitals, and
(3) high school students.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 6:05 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
28. What level of proof is required for school officials to search a high school student?
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 12
a.
probable cause
b.
no proof
c.
reasonable suspicion
d.
preponderance of evidence
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Drug Testing
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.07 – Understand and appreciate how SCOTUS has applied the balancing
ideal to drug testing of (1) employees in the workplace, (2) pregnant women in hospitals, and
(3) high school students.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 6:09 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
29. What is required for the drug tests of public employees to be justified?
a.
Routine procedures are established to protect individual privacy.
b.
Routine procedures are established to promote public safety.
c.
The employee must have violated safety rules.
d.
Nothing is required, and public employees can be tested at any time.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Drug Testing
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.07 – Understand and appreciate how SCOTUS has applied the balancing
ideal to drug testing of (1) employees in the workplace, (2) pregnant women in hospitals, and
(3) high school students.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 6:12 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:37 AM
30. According to State v. Ellis, who may conduct a dormitory room search in Ohio without any justification?
a.
law enforcement
b.
campus police
c.
law enforcement and campus police
d.
resident assistants
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Custody-Related Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.07.07 – Understand and appreciate how SCOTUS has applied the balancing
ideal to drug testing of (1) employees in the workplace, (2) pregnant women in hospitals, and
(3) high school students.