HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.05 – Know and appreciate that the millions of searches incident to arrest
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.03 – Know that search warrants require both particularity and probable
cause. Understand that, with some exceptions, officers have to knock, announce their
presence, and give occupants an opportunity to open the door, before forcible entry of homes.
Appreciate the radical changes in the use of search warrants in the Digital Age.
62. Explain how the “digital age” has impacted search warrants and criminal law enforcement. Provide practical examples
of how these issues might impact criminal law enforcement.
In Exhibit 6.1, Reflections on Law and Technology, retired magistrate Judge John Facciola
discusses several of the effects of technology. Included in his discussion are the topics: most
criminal warrants today are issued for electronic information; judges need to be
technologically adept and understand technology; challenges to the Fourth Amendment
particularity requirement when searching electronics; and the need for lawyers to read outside
of their field.
This is one example of a correct answer, others may apply.
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.03 – Know that search warrants require both particularity and probable
cause. Understand that, with some exceptions, officers have to knock, announce their
presence, and give occupants an opportunity to open the door, before forcible entry of homes.
Appreciate the radical changes in the use of search warrants in the Digital Age.
63. Describe a search incident to a pretext arrest, and explain its significance.
A pretext stop or arrest occurs when police officers use the objective basis for one event,
commonly a traffic offense, as a means to do a search or an investigation for a more serious
crime that the officers believe the stopped individual may have committed, but for which
they do not have probable cause.
For example, police officers may believe that a driver has drugs in a car. However, they do
not have probable cause to search the car for drugs. The police could follow the car until the
driver commits a traffic violation and then stop the car for this. If the state law allows, they
could then arrest the driver for the traffic violation and conduct a search incident to lawful
arrest of the car’s interior, pursuant to New York v. Belton. If the search turns up drugs, then
the driver would be arrested for that more serious offense.
REFERENCES:
Searches Without Warrants