Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 1
1. Which of the following is not needed to satisfy the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement?
a.
reasonable suspicion
b.
the particularity requirement
c.
a probable cause affidavit
d.
the knock-and-announce rule
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Search Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.02 – Understand that searches hardly ever require warrants, except when
officers want to search homes. Know how officers can execute warrants to search homes
“reasonably.”
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 2:41 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
2. The Fourth Amendment particularity requirement for search warrants:
a.
does not require a specific address of the place to be searched, but the items to be seized must be specifically
described.
b.
requires that the warrant specifically describe the place to be searched and the things to be seized.
c.
requires a specific address, but gives police the discretion to search for whatever they might consider
incriminating evidence.
d.
requires police to describe in detail their reasons for investigating the offender.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Search Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.03 – Know that search warrants require both particularity and probable
cause. Understand that, with some exceptions, officers have to knock, announce their
presence, and give occupants an opportunity to open the door, before forcible entry of homes.
Appreciate the radical changes in the use of search warrants in the Digital Age.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 3:34 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
3. Which is true about containers?
a.
They can only be searched with probable cause and a warrant.
b.
No warrant is ever needed to search them, if there is probable cause to do so.
c.
No warrant is needed if the container is found in a car the police have probable cause to search, and the
container is a likely place to find items that police are searching for.
d.
No warrant is needed if the container is found in a vehicle the police have probable cause to search, regardless
of the nature of the container.
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Consent Searches
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 2
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.08 – Understand that the searches of vehicles without warrants are
constitutional because of their mobility and the reduced expectation of privacy in vehicles.
Know that searches of containers and persons within the vehicles without warrants are
“reasonable” as long as they’re based on probable cause.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 3:42 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
4. According to the Court of Appeals decision in United States v. Rodney:
a.
b.
c.
d.
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Consent Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.07 – Know how to determine the scope of consent; when consent can be
withdrawn; and when one person can consent for another. Appreciate the Criminal Procedure
ideal of evidence-based decision making and the empirical research of consent searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 3:44 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
5. The following are all examples of emergency search situations, except:
a.
police following a suspect they are chasing into a home.
b.
searching a home with a suspected drug dealer inside.
c.
police entering and searching a house after having received a call for help from someone in the house.
d.
entering a house on fire to search for anyone potentially inside.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Emergency Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.09 – Understand that emergency searches are based on the idea that it’s
sometimes impractical to require officers to obtain warrants before they search. Know the
four major types of emergency searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 3:48 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
6. The reasonableness of searches pursuant to search warrants depends on:
a.
the existence of probable cause only.
b.
the existence of probable cause and the extent of the search only.
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 3
c.
the existence of probable cause, the extent of the search, and the particularity of the warrant only.
d.
the existence of probable cause, the extent of the search, the particularity of the warrant, and the manner in
which the police enter the place to be searched.
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Search Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.02 – Understand that searches hardly ever require warrants, except when
officers want to search homes. Know how officers can execute warrants to search homes
“reasonably.”
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 3:49 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
7. In Wilson v. Arkansas, SCOTUS unanimously decided that:
a.
the Fourth Amendment prohibits all “no–knock” entries.
b.
the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit “no–knock” entries.
c.
the police are never required to follow the rule of announcement when executing a search warrant.
d.
ordinarily, the Fourth Amendment requires that police knock and announce.
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Search Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.03 – Know that search warrants require both particularity and probable
cause. Understand that, with some exceptions, officers have to knock, announce their
presence, and give occupants an opportunity to open the door, before forcible entry of homes.
Appreciate the radical changes in the use of search warrants in the Digital Age.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 3:51 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
8. Which of the following is not an exception to the warrant requirement approved by SCOTUS?
a.
a search based on an informant tip
b.
a consent search
c.
a container search
d.
a vehicle search
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Search Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.02 – Understand that searches hardly ever require warrants, except when
officers want to search homes. Know how officers can execute warrants to search homes
“reasonably.”
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.03 – Know that search warrants require both particularity and probable
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 4
cause. Understand that, with some exceptions, officers have to knock, announce their
presence, and give occupants an opportunity to open the door, before forcible entry of homes.
Appreciate the radical changes in the use of search warrants in the Digital Age.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 3:53 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
9. The countervailing law enforcement interests against “no–knock” entry requirements identified by Justice Thomas in
Wilson v. Arkansas include:
a.
safety of officers and escape of the suspect.
b.
safety of officers and safety of occupants.
c.
safety of occupants and destruction of evidence.
d.
safety of officers, escape of the suspect, and destruction of evidence.
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Search Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.03 – Know that search warrants require both particularity and probable
cause. Understand that, with some exceptions, officers have to knock, announce their
presence, and give occupants an opportunity to open the door, before forcible entry of homes.
Appreciate the radical changes in the use of search warrants in the Digital Age.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 3:55 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
10. In California v. Acevedo (1991), SCOTUS ruled that officers with probable cause but without warrants can search
containers inside vehicles:
a.
never, as this is not permissible.
b.
only with apparent authority consent.
c.
only with actual authority consent.
d.
if the container isn’t an essential part of the vehicle.
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Vehicle Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.08 – Understand that the searches of vehicles without warrants are
constitutional because of their mobility and the reduced expectation of privacy in vehicles.
Know that searches of containers and persons within the vehicles without warrants are
“reasonable” as long as they’re based on probable cause.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 3:57 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
11. Consent that takes place when one person in fact has the legal authority to consent to a search of the home and
possessions of another person is called:
a.
apparent authority consent.
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 5
b.
official consent.
c.
prospective consent.
d.
actual authority consent.
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Consent Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.07 – Know how to determine the scope of consent; when consent can be
withdrawn; and when one person can consent for another. Appreciate the Criminal Procedure
ideal of evidence-based decision making and the empirical research of consent searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 3:59 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
12. According to SCOTUS in Chimel v. California, involving the search of a house incident to an arrest for burglary of a
coin shop:
a.
it is not reasonable to search a person who is lawfully arrested.
b.
it is not reasonable to search an entire house incident to a lawful arrest.
c.
the Fourth Amendment does not protect searches incident to lawful arrests.
d.
police must always have search warrants to search persons.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches Without Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.05 – Know and appreciate that the millions of searches incident to arrest
are reasonable without warrants, because they protect officers, prevent escape, and preserve
evidence. Understand the scope of incident searches, and know the types of crime and
circumstances that can be subject to these searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:02 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
13. Under the holding in Chimel v. California (1969), a leading SCOTUS case on searches incident to arrest, the police
must limit a thorough search incident to arrest to:
a.
the arrestee’s person (body and clothing).
b.
the arrestee’s person and the area within the arrestee’s immediate control.
c.
the arrestee’s person and the room in which the arrestee is arrested.
d.
the arrestee’s person and the dwelling in which the arrestee is arrested.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches Without Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.05 – Know and appreciate that the millions of searches incident to arrest
are reasonable without warrants, because they protect officers, prevent escape, and preserve
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 6
evidence. Understand the scope of incident searches, and know the types of crime and
circumstances that can be subject to these searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:04 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
14. According to the SCOTUS holding in Arizona v. Gant (2009), police may search a vehicle incident to a recent
occupant’s arrest, only if the arrestee is within reaching distance of the passenger compartment at the time of the search,
or if:
a.
there is no second reason for a search.
b.
the police have reason to believe that there is evidence in the car.
c.
it is reasonable to believe that the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest.
d.
the police have reasonable suspicion that the car contains contraband or weapons.
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches Without Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.05 – Know and appreciate that the millions of searches incident to arrest
are reasonable without warrants, because they protect officers, prevent escape, and preserve
evidence. Understand the scope of incident searches, and know the types of crime and
circumstances that can be subject to these searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:11 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
15. In U.S. v. Robinson (1973), the police had stopped the defendant for driving with a revoked driver’s permit.
SCOTUS’s ruling with respect to the legality of the search of the defendant is important, because it held that:
a.
a search incident to arrest may be conducted only where there is probable cause that the arrestee has weapons
or evidence on his or her person.
b.
a search incident to arrest may be conducted only where there is reasonable suspicion.
c.
a search incident to a full custody arrest may be conducted regardless of the likelihood of finding weapons or
evidence on the arrestee’s person.
d.
a search may not be conducted incident to an arrest for a traffic offense.
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches Without Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.05 – Know and appreciate that the millions of searches incident to arrest
are reasonable without warrants, because they protect officers, prevent escape, and preserve
evidence. Understand the scope of incident searches, and know the types of crime and
circumstances that can be subject to these searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:14 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
16. In Knowles v. Iowa, concerning an instance where a driver had been given a citation for speeding but had not been
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 7
arrested, SCOTUS held that:
a.
the officer issuing the citation could still do a search incident to arrest.
b.
the same concern for officer safety that was present in a full custodial arrest situation was present in every
traffic stop.
c.
police could not automatically do a search incident to arrest when only a citation is involved.
d.
police could automatically do a search of the driver’s person, but not of the vehicle.
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches Without Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.05 – Know and appreciate that the millions of searches incident to arrest
are reasonable without warrants, because they protect officers, prevent escape, and preserve
evidence. Understand the scope of incident searches, and know the types of crime and
circumstances that can be subject to these searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:16 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
17. What is the name of an emergency created by the need to pursue a fleeing suspect?
a.
community danger
b.
immediate danger
c.
evidence destruction
d.
hot pursuit
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Emergency Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.09 – Understand that emergency searches are based on the idea that it’s
sometimes impractical to require officers to obtain warrants before they search. Know the
four major types of emergency searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:19 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
18. According to SCOTUS’s decision in Whren v. U.S, concerning the use of a pretext stop in a drug search:
a.
pretext arrests violate the Fourth Amendment.
b.
courts should use a “balancing” test to decide the constitutionality of auto stops.
c.
a search incident to a lawful arrest for a traffic violation is a reasonable Fourth Amendment search.
d.
pretext stops and the searches incident to them should be kept at a minimum.
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches Without Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 8
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.05 – Know and appreciate that the millions of searches incident to arrest
are reasonable without warrants, because they protect officers, prevent escape, and preserve
evidence. Understand the scope of incident searches, and know the types of crime and
circumstances that can be subject to these searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:20 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
19. Police ordinarily seek consent to search:
a.
when they do not have probable cause and cannot get a warrant.
b.
after a judge has refused to issue a warrant.
c.
when they think the person is intoxicated.
d.
when they are dealing with teenagers.
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Consent Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.06 – Know that the millions of consent searches allow officers to search
without warrants or probable cause. Appreciate that without consent, officers couldn’t
conduct the search.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:23 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
20. In order to conduct a consent search of a person, an officer must have:
a.
probable cause to believe the suspect has items that could be seized on his or her person.
b.
a valid warrant.
c.
reasonable suspicion to make a stop.
d.
voluntary consent to search.
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Consent Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.07 – Know how to determine the scope of consent; when consent can be
withdrawn; and when one person can consent for another. Appreciate the Criminal Procedure
ideal of evidence-based decision making and the empirical research of consent searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:25 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
21. According to the waiver test of consent:
a.
any search free of coercion is obtained by consent.
b.
those who consent need to know that they have a right to refuse consent.
c.
once a person consents, they cannot retract consent.
d.
a consent search is valid only if the person consenting voluntarily and knowingly waives the Fourth
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 9
Amendment rights.
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Consent Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.07 – Know how to determine the scope of consent; when consent can be
withdrawn; and when one person can consent for another. Appreciate the Criminal Procedure
ideal of evidence-based decision making and the empirical research of consent searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:28 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
22. According to the empirical research about consent searches:
a.
lower courts find that consent was voluntary in all but the most extreme cases.
b.
lower courts are very willing to set consent searches aside when they find they were not voluntary.
c.
there are so few consent search cases that courts have had little opportunity to rule on the issue.
d.
judges are skeptical of consent searches and critical of the police in their written opinions.
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Consent Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.07 – Know how to determine the scope of consent; when consent can be
withdrawn; and when one person can consent for another. Appreciate the Criminal Procedure
ideal of evidence-based decision making and the empirical research of consent searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:29 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
23. Which of the following would not justify an emergency search?
a.
the belief of danger to community safety
b.
an inconvenient location for waiting with a suspect for a warrant
c.
the potential of a suspect destroying evidence
d.
the belief of danger to officers
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Consent Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.09 – Understand that emergency searches are based on the idea that it’s
sometimes impractical to require officers to obtain warrants before they search. Know the
four major types of emergency searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:31 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 10
24. What is the name of the practice of officers going to a person’s residence, with or without any objective basis, and
knocking on the door so as to obtain plain views of home interiors, question the residents, or ask for consent to search?
a.
particularity requirement
b.
search incident to arrest
c.
knock-and-announce rule
d.
knock-and-talk technique
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Search Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.04 – Understand that the knock-and-talk technique is a powerful
investigative tool that SCOTUS has not yet interrogated.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:33 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
25. The criminal procedure value of balancing privacy and community safety weighs heavily on which side of the
balance?
a.
the police side
b.
the defendant side
c.
the community side
d.
the privacy side
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Search Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.03 – Know that search warrants require both particularity and probable
cause. Understand that, with some exceptions, officers have to knock, announce their
presence, and give occupants an opportunity to open the door, before forcible entry of homes.
Appreciate the radical changes in the use of search warrants in the Digital Age.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:34 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
26. In what landmark case did SCOTUS rule that a knock and talk violated the Fourth Amendment?
a.
Johnson v. U.S. (1948)
b.
Arizona v. Gant (2009)
c.
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1973)
d.
Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990)
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Search Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 11
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.04 – Understand that the knock-and-talk technique is a powerful
investigative tool that SCOTUS has not yet interrogated.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:36 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
27. Concerning third-party consent to search, in which of the following situations can one person consent to a search for
the other person?
a.
A janitor consenting to the search of the employer’s premises.
b.
A school administrator consenting to the search of a guidance counselor’s locked desk containing confidential
records.
c.
A factory owner consenting to a search of items on top of an employee’s workbench.
d.
A landlord consenting to the search of a tenant’s apartment.
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Consent Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.07 – Know how to determine the scope of consent; when consent can be
withdrawn; and when one person can consent for another. Appreciate the Criminal Procedure
ideal of evidence-based decision making and the empirical research of consent searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:38 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
28. In Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990), the police conducted the consent search of the suspect’s apartment based on the
consent of the suspect’s former girlfriend. According to the apparent authority of third-party consent theory:
a.
third-party consent cannot be used to enter a person’s home, whether to make an arrest or to search.
b.
the third party who is giving consent to search must have actual authority over the premises.
c.
the warrantless entry to search based on third-party consent is valid if the officer reasonably believes that the
person consenting had authority to consent.
d.
a search completed pursuant to an officer’s reasonable but mistaken belief that a third party had authority to
consent violates the Fourth Amendment.
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Consent Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.07 – Know how to determine the scope of consent; when consent can be
withdrawn; and when one person can consent for another. Appreciate the Criminal Procedure
ideal of evidence-based decision making and the empirical research of consent searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:40 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
29. Which of the following is true of most people who consent to searches by law enforcement?
a.
They are older.
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 12
b.
They are white.
c.
They are middle class.
d.
They are innocent.
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Consent Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.06 – Know that the millions of consent searches allow officers to search
without warrants or probable cause. Appreciate that without consent, officers couldn’t
conduct the search.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:43 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
30. When police arrest a suspect based on probable cause, but then conduct a search without probable cause or a warrant,
the search is called a:
a.
consent search.
b.
search incident to arrest.
c.
stop-and-frisk search.
d.
pretext search.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches Without Warrants
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.05 – Know and appreciate that the millions of searches incident to arrest
are reasonable without warrants, because they protect officers, prevent escape, and preserve
evidence. Understand the scope of incident searches, and know the types of crime and
circumstances that can be subject to these searches.
KEYWORDS:
BLOOM’S: Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/4/2017 4:45 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 3:49 AM
31. The vehicle exception to the warrant requirement is based upon:
a.
the inherent mobility of the vehicle, and the impracticality of impounding the vehicle and getting a warrant.
b.
the inherent mobility of the vehicle, and the reduced expectation of privacy in vehicles.
c.
the convenience of the police.
d.
the reduced expectation of privacy in vehicles, and the convenience of the police.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Vehicle Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.06.08 – Understand that the searches of vehicles without warrants are
constitutional because of their mobility and the reduced expectation of privacy in vehicles.
Know that searches of containers and persons within the vehicles without warrants are