Unlock document.
This document is partially blurred.
Unlock all pages and 1 million more documents.
Get Access
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 1
1. Until 1967, SCOTUS defined searches mainly according to property law. According to the _______________, to
qualify as a search, officers had to physically invade a “constitutionally protected area.”
a.
constitutionality doctrine
b.
privacy doctrine
c.
trespass doctrine
d.
reasonable expectation of privacy doctrine
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.03 - Understand that the Fourth Amendment bans only “unreasonable”
searches and seizures made by law enforcement in order to balance the government’s power
to control crime and the liberty and privacy rights of individuals.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 6:54 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
2. What is the first question in the three main steps in Fourth Amendment analyses?
a.
Was the law enforcement action a “search” or a “seizure”?
b.
If the action was a search or a seizure, was it reasonable?
c.
If the action was an unreasonable search, does the Fourth Amendment ban its use as evidence?
d.
If the action was reasonable, can the evidence be used to impeach a witness?
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Chapter Introduction
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.01 - Know that Fourth Amendment analyses follow a three-stop process
based on the answers to three questions in the following order: (1) Was the law enforcement
action a “search” or “seizure”? (2) If the action was a search or seizure, was it reasonable? (3)
If the search/seizure was unreasonable, does the Fourth Amendment ban its use as evidence?
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 6:55 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
3. In Illinois v. Caballes (2005), SCOTUS ruled that:
a.
drivers of automobiles have a reasonable expectation of privacy that protects them from the use of drug-
sniffing dogs without a warrant.
b.
drug-sniffing dogs can only be used if there is reasonable suspicion the driver has narcotics.
c.
drug-sniffing dog searches are prone to many errors and are so intimidating that officials must have probable
cause to use them.
d.
the use of well-trained drug-sniffing dogs to expose contraband items that would remain hidden in a routine
traffic stop does not intrude on a driver’s reasonable expectation of privacy, and the Fourth Amendment does
not apply.
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 2
REFERENCES:
The History and Purposes of the Fourth Amendment
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.04 - Know that if government actions don’t invade an expectation of
privacy that society is prepared to recognize, it’s not a search, and the Fourth Amendment
doesn’t apply. In other words, the actions are left to the discretion of individual officers.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 6:57 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
4. What is the second question in the three main steps in Fourth Amendment analyses?
a.
How will the action affect the presentation of evidence?
b.
If the action was a search or a seizure, was it reasonable?
c.
If the action was an unreasonable search, does the Fourth Amendment ban its use as evidence?
d.
Was the law enforcement action a “search” or a “seizure”?
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Chapter Introduction
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.01 - Know that Fourth Amendment analyses follow a three-stop process
based on the answers to three questions in the following order: (1) Was the law enforcement
action a “search” or “seizure”? (2) If the action was a search or seizure, was it reasonable? (3)
If the search/seizure was unreasonable, does the Fourth Amendment ban its use as evidence?
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 6:58 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
5. What is the third question in the three main steps in Fourth Amendment analyses?
a.
If the action was a search or a seizure, was it reasonable?
b.
Was the law enforcement action compliant with the Bill of Rights?
c.
Was the law enforcement action a “search” or a “seizure”?
d.
If the action was an unreasonable search, does the Fourth Amendment ban its use as evidence?
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Chapter Introduction
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.01 - Know that Fourth Amendment analyses follow a three-stop process
based on the answers to three questions in the following order: (1) Was the law enforcement
action a “search” or “seizure”? (2) If the action was a search or seizure, was it reasonable? (3)
If the search/seizure was unreasonable, does the Fourth Amendment ban its use as evidence?
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 6:58 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
6. In what case did the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals decide that the searches of a laptop computer, a cell phone,
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 3
and a flash drive were private searches (searches conducted by private parties not associated with the government)?
U.S. v. Miller (1976)
a.
U.S. v. Lichtenberger (2015)
b.
Illinois v. Caballes (2005)
c.
U.S. v. White (1971)
d.
U.S. v. Miller (1976)
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.03 - Understand that the Fourth Amendment bans only “unreasonable”
searches and seizures made by law enforcement in order to balance the government’s power
to control crime and the liberty and privacy rights of individuals.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 6:59 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
7. General warrants, or writs of assistance, as they were known in Britain and in the American colonies:
a.
gave officers blanket authority to completely search a particular shop or home.
b.
found favor in the American colonies because they were more restrictive than a warrantless search.
c.
gave the person with the writ authority to enter any house for the entire life of the monarch.
d.
were repealed in the American colonies by the Stamp Act.
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
The History and Purposes of the Fourth Amendment
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.02 - Know that the original purposes for searches and seizures were to
enforce sedition and customs laws, not the ordinary crimes that concern law enforcement
today.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:00 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
8. In which of the following places does the privacy doctrine apply?
a.
overhearing a conversation on the street
b.
opening a briefcase and looking inside
c.
climbing over a backyard fence
d.
standing in the street and looking into a living room through open curtains
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.04 - Know that if government actions don’t invade an expectation of
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 4
privacy that society is prepared to recognize, it’s not a search, and the Fourth Amendment
doesn’t apply. In other words, the actions are left to the discretion of individual officers.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:01 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
9. The first part of a writ of assistance, where royal agents can search anyone, anywhere, anytime, is referred to as a
_______________ warrant.
a.
general
b.
constitutional
c.
privacy
d.
specific
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
The History and Purposes of the Fourth Amendment
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.02 - Know that the original purposes for searches and seizures were to
enforce sedition and customs laws, not the ordinary crimes that concern law enforcement
today.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:11 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
10. In what decade did SCOTUS replace the trespass doctrine with the reasonable expectation of privacy doctrine?
a.
the 1960s
b.
the 1970s
c.
the 1950s
d.
the 1980s
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.04 - Know that if government actions don’t invade an expectation of
privacy that society is prepared to recognize, it’s not a search, and the Fourth Amendment
doesn’t apply. In other words, the actions are left to the discretion of individual officers.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:25 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
11. What case resulted in the rule that a person's right to privacy outweighs their location?
a.
Tennessee v. Garner
b.
Mapp v. Ohio
c.
Katz v. U.S.
d.
Miranda v. Arizona
ANSWER:
c
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 5
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.04 - Know that if government actions don’t invade an expectation of
privacy that society is prepared to recognize, it’s not a search, and the Fourth Amendment
doesn’t apply. In other words, the actions are left to the discretion of individual officers.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:26 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
12. The privacy doctrine is an example of balancing the government’s power to control crime and:
a.
the individual’s right to be let alone by the government.
b.
law enforcement’s need to search for evidence.
c.
judicial authority to grant search warrants.
d.
the appellate authority of state courts.
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.04 - Know that if government actions don’t invade an expectation of
privacy that society is prepared to recognize, it’s not a search, and the Fourth Amendment
doesn’t apply. In other words, the actions are left to the discretion of individual officers.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:26 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
13. What is needed to establish that government action is a search?
a.
subjective privacy
b.
subjective and objective privacy
c.
objective privacy
d.
government intent
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.04 - Know that if government actions don’t invade an expectation of
privacy that society is prepared to recognize, it’s not a search, and the Fourth Amendment
doesn’t apply. In other words, the actions are left to the discretion of individual officers.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:27 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
14. SCOTUS has held that citizens, under certain circumstances, have no reasonable expectation of privacy in which of
the following?
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 6
a.
telephone conversations
b.
bank records
c.
private papers
d.
letters given to the post office
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.04 - Know that if government actions don’t invade an expectation of
privacy that society is prepared to recognize, it’s not a search, and the Fourth Amendment
doesn’t apply. In other words, the actions are left to the discretion of individual officers.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:28 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
15. According to SCOTUS in Smith v. Maryland (1979), a person does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in:
a.
a personal diary.
b.
telephone conversations.
c.
the telephone numbers that the person dials.
d.
the briefcase that the person carries in a public place.
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.04 - Know that if government actions don’t invade an expectation of
privacy that society is prepared to recognize, it’s not a search, and the Fourth Amendment
doesn’t apply. In other words, the actions are left to the discretion of individual officers.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:28 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
16. In California v. Greenwood (1988), SCOTUS held that:
a.
there is no reasonable expectation of privacy for the trash people place in the waste baskets located in their
homes.
b.
there is no reasonable expectation of privacy for the trash people place outside (in bags or cans) for pick-up on
the front curbs of their homes.
c.
there is never a reasonable expectation of privacy for trash.
d.
there is no reasonable expectation of privacy for trash, unless people have shredded it.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.04 - Know that if government actions don’t invade an expectation of
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 7
privacy that society is prepared to recognize, it’s not a search, and the Fourth Amendment
doesn’t apply. In other words, the actions are left to the discretion of individual officers.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:29 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
17. According to the SCOTUS opinion in U.S. v. White (1971), involving a friend wired for sound for the police:
a.
a defendant has a constitutionally protected expectation that a person with whom he or she is conversing will
not reveal the conversation to the police.
b.
a person contemplating illegal activities must realize and risk that a friend might be reporting to the police.
c.
a suspect’s friend may relate the substance of conversations between the two without violating the Fourth
Amendment, but the amendment is violated if the friend records those conversations for the police without a
warrant.
d.
a search warrant is required any time electronic devices are used to obtain evidence.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.04 - Know that if government actions don’t invade an expectation of
privacy that society is prepared to recognize, it’s not a search, and the Fourth Amendment
doesn’t apply. In other words, the actions are left to the discretion of individual officers.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:30 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
18. In what case did SCOTUS rule that, in some circumstances, there is no right to privacy in bank records?
a.
Illinois v. Caballes (2005)
b.
U.S. v. Jones (2012)
c.
U.S. v. Miller (1976)
d.
State v. Patino (2012)
ANSWER:
c
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.04 - Know that if government actions don’t invade an expectation of
privacy that society is prepared to recognize, it’s not a search, and the Fourth Amendment
doesn’t apply. In other words, the actions are left to the discretion of individual officers.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:30 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
19. In what case did SCOTUS decide that attaching a GPS receiver and monitoring a Jeep Grand Cherokee was a Fourth
Amendment search?
a.
U.S. v. Jones (2012)
b.
State v. Patino (2012)
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 8
c.
U.S. v. Ganias (2014)
d.
Illinois v. Caballes (2005)
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches in the Digital Age
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.07 - Understand that property is seized whenever the government
meaningfully interferes with an individual’s possession of something. Appreciate the unique
challenges of defining “property,” such as files on a computer, in the Digital Age.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:31 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
20. In what case did the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals decide there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in private
emails?
a.
U.S. v. Warshak (2010)
b.
Kyllo v. U.S. (2001)
c.
U.S. v. White (1971)
d.
U.S. v. Jones (2012)
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches in the Digital Age
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.07 - Understand that property is seized whenever the government
meaningfully interferes with an individual’s possession of something. Appreciate the unique
challenges of defining “property,” such as files on a computer, in the Digital Age.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:32 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
21. The case of State v. Patino (2012) resulted in what conclusion from SCOTUS regarding the right to privacy in text
messages?
a.
The right to privacy did not extend to the messages contained on another’s phone.
b.
The defendant had no right to privacy in personal text messages.
c.
There is never a right to privacy in text messages.
d.
The right to privacy never extends to text messages on the sending party’s cell phone.
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches in the Digital Age
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.07 - Understand that property is seized whenever the government
meaningfully interferes with an individual’s possession of something. Appreciate the unique
challenges of defining “property,” such as files on a computer, in the Digital Age.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 9
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:32 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
22. In Kyllo v. U.S. (2001), SCOTUS ruled that the discovery and measurement of which of the following from a home
was a Fourth Amendment search?
a.
odor
b.
light
c.
noise
d.
heat
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches in the Digital Age
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.06 - Appreciate the SCOTUS’s difficult job of balancing government
power to control crime with individual liberty and privacy in the Digital Age. Know that
SCOTUS has yet to decide if there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in some common
forms of communication, such as text messages and emails.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:33 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
23. Police used a thermal imager to scan Kyllo’s home, because they had information that he was growing marijuana.
Officers did not have a warrant and claimed the search was in plain view. SCOTUS ruled that:
a.
the use of a thermal imager did not alter the fact that the officers observed the marijuana in plain view.
b.
the use of a thermal imager to explore details of a home that, in the past, would have been unknown without a
physical intrusion is a search and is subject to Fourth Amendment requirements.
c.
thermal imagers are common devices and, therefore, the search was in plain view.
d.
the use of a thermal imager is always illegal.
ANSWER:
b
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches in the Digital Age
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.06 - Appreciate the SCOTUS’s difficult job of balancing government
power to control crime with individual liberty and privacy in the Digital Age. Know that
SCOTUS has yet to decide if there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in some common
forms of communication, such as text messages and emails.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:34 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
24. In Illinois v. Caballes (2005), SCOTUS held that what amendment did not apply to a drug-sniffing dog alerting on a
car trunk?
a.
the Fourth Amendment
b.
the Fifth Amendment
c.
the Sixth Amendment
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 10
d.
the Fourteenth Amendment
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.04 - Know that if government actions don’t invade an expectation of
privacy that society is prepared to recognize, it’s not a search, and the Fourth Amendment
doesn’t apply. In other words, the actions are left to the discretion of individual officers.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/3/2017 7:34 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:38 AM
25. The digital age has presented unique challenges for the Court in addressing which of the following?
a.
the definition of “property”
b.
reasonable expectation of privacy in text messages
c.
reasonable expectation of privacy in emails
d.
the definition of “property” and reasonable expectations in text messages and emails
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Seizures of Property
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.07 - Understand that property is seized whenever the government
meaningfully interferes with an individual’s possession of something. Appreciate the unique
challenges of defining “property,” such as files on a computer, in the Digital Age.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/6/2017 4:57 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 4:58 AM
26. The two-pronged test of privacy to determine whether a police action is actually a “search” is referred to as
the:
a.
subjective and objective privacy test.
b.
moral and legal privacy test.
c.
prosecutorial and defense privacy test.
d.
habeas corpus and the corpus delicti test.
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.04 - Know that if government actions don’t invade an expectation of
privacy that society is prepared to recognize, it’s not a search, and the Fourth Amendment
doesn’t apply. In other words, the actions are left to the discretion of individual officers.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/6/2017 4:59 AM
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 11
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 5:00 AM
27. SCOTUS has not yet decided if searches of certain types of technology constitute Fourth Amendment
searches. Which of the following has not been addressed by SCOTUS?
a.
thermal imagers
b.
GPS trackers
c.
bank statements
d.
texting
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches in the Digital Age
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.06 - Appreciate the SCOTUS’s difficult job of balancing government
power to control crime with individual liberty and privacy in the Digital Age. Know that
SCOTUS has yet to decide if there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in some common
forms of communication, such as text messages and emails.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/6/2017 5:00 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 5:01 AM
28. What doctrine holds that, whenever we knowingly reveal our incriminating secrets, we assume the risk that our
false friends will use them against us in criminal cases?
a.
private-search reconstruction doctrine
b.
private search doctrine
c.
trespass doctrine
d.
third-party doctrine
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.04 - Know that if government actions don’t invade an expectation of
privacy that society is prepared to recognize, it’s not a search, and the Fourth Amendment
doesn’t apply. In other words, the actions are left to the discretion of individual officers.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/6/2017 5:02 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 5:03 AM
29. According to SCOTUS, which of the following are constitutionally protected areas?
a.
garages
b.
hotel rooms
c.
stores
d.
garages, hotel rooms, and stores
ANSWER:
d
POINTS:
1
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
Page 12
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.03 - Understand that the Fourth Amendment bans only “unreasonable”
searches and seizures made by law enforcement in order to balance the government’s power
to control crime and the liberty and privacy rights of individuals.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/6/2017 5:03 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 5:04 AM
30. What doctrine did SCOTUS create in U.S. v. Jacobsen (1984)?
a.
the private search doctrine
b.
the reasonable expectation of privacy doctrine
c.
private-search reconstruction doctrine
d.
the trespass doctrine
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Searches
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.03 - Understand that the Fourth Amendment bans only “unreasonable”
searches and seizures made by law enforcement in order to balance the government’s power
to control crime and the liberty and privacy rights of individuals.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/6/2017 5:04 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 5:05 AM
31. In U.S. v. Galpin (2009), the court addresses the issue of reasonable expectation of privacy in computer files
and compares a computer to which of the following?
a.
a residence
b.
a workplace
c.
a hotel room
d.
a car
ANSWER:
a
POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Seizures of Property
QUESTION TYPE:
Multiple Choice
HAS VARIABLES:
False
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.03.07 - Understand that property is seized whenever the government
meaningfully interferes with an individual’s possession of something. Appreciate the unique
challenges of defining “property,” such as files on a computer, in the Digital Age.
KEYWORDS:
Remember
DATE CREATED:
1/6/2017 5:09 AM
DATE MODIFIED:
1/6/2017 5:10 AM
32. An individual person’s expectation of privacy is called:
