Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
17. The two landmark cases that began the federal government’s gradual entry into state criminal justice were Powell v.
Alabama (1932) and:
Miranda v. Arizona (1966).
U.S. v. Armstrong (1996).
Rochin v. California (1952).
Brown v. Mississippi (1936).
CRPR.SAMA.18.02.09 – Know, understand, and appreciate that after a decades-long
struggle, a Supreme Court majority came to agree that “due process” requires the
incorporation of the specific criminal procedure provisions in the U.S. Bill of Rights and that
incorporation changed day-to–day criminal procedure by expanding its intervention from the
courtroom to public spaces and not-so-public police stations.
18. The cases of Powell v. Alabama (1932) and Brown v. Mississippi (1936) established what came to be known as:
the criminal procedure doctrine.
the due process doctrine.
the distinguishing case doctrine.
the fundamental fairness doctrine.
CRPR.SAMA.18.02.09 – Know, understand, and appreciate that after a decades-long
struggle, a Supreme Court majority came to agree that “due process” requires the
incorporation of the specific criminal procedure provisions in the U.S. Bill of Rights and that
incorporation changed day-to–day criminal procedure by expanding its intervention from the
courtroom to public spaces and not-so-public police stations.
19. The fundamental fairness doctrine of due process requires states to provide:
notice to defendants of the charges against them, an attorney at state expense if they cannot afford one, and a
hearing on the facts before conviction and punishment.
notice to defendants of the charges against them and a hearing on the facts before conviction and punishment.