POINTS:
1
REFERENCES:
Administrative Remedies
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
CRPR.SAMA.18.11.08 – Know the role of administrative action in remedying misconduct.
64. Identify the two elements that plaintiffs in § 1983 actions against state and local law enforcement officers have to
prove. Identify and describe the two limits placed by SCOTUS on § 1983 actions against state and local officers.
In a § 1983 action against state and local law enforcement officers, the plaintiff must prove
two elements:
(1) The officials acted “under color of state law,” which includes all acts done within the
scope of the officers’ employment.
(2) The officers’ actions caused the deprivation of the plaintiff’s federal rights.
Besides the two statutory elements that plaintiffs must prove in a § 1983 action, SCOTUS has
added two more:
(1) The plaintiff cannot recover for accidental or even negligent violations of federal civil
rights. The law enforcement officers’ violations must be deliberate.
(2) State and local officers are protected by the same qualified immunity, under § 1983, that
federal officers have, under Bivens and the Federal Tort Claims Act.
CRPR.SAMA.18.11.04 – Know the role of Civil Rights Act actions in holding law
enforcement officials responsible for violating the constitutional rights of individuals.
Understand the limitations of lawsuits brought against states and their officers.
65. The most common accountability procedure for all kinds of police misconduct is administrative review and discipline
outside the courts. Define the two types of administrative review, and discuss any differences between the two types.
The two types of administrative review are: an internal affairs unit (IAU) review and an
external civilian review. An IAU review is a review of police misconduct by special officers
inside a police department. An external civilian review is a review of complaints against
police officers with participation by individuals who aren’t sworn police officers.
Internal review consists of four consecutive stages: intake, investigation, deliberation, and
disposition. Four possible decisions can be made in the deliberation stage: unfounded,
exonerated, not sustained, and sustained. If the decision is unfounded, exonerated, or not
sustained, the case is disposed of and closed. If the decision is sustained, the supervisor
recommends disciplinary action. This recommendation goes through the chain of command
until it reaches the chief, who makes the decision regarding the disciplinary action.