1. Statements from the Bible about the natural world do not count as scientific evidence because:
a. The people responsible for these claims are all dead.
b. They are always infected with theological claims.
c. They do not report the results of measurements expressed mathematically.
d. The authorship of these documents is subject to debate.
e. They are usually expressed in metaphorical language.
2. Superstitious claims are usually expressed in vague language. As a result:
a. They engage only the emotions and never the intellect.
b. It is often difficult to distinguish one such claim from another.
c. Scientists have no interest in them.
d. It is usually impossible to subject them to empirical test.
e. They lend themselves too readily to ad hoc modifications.
3. According to Karl Popper, genuinely scientific hypotheses must be:
a. Falsifiable.
b. Testable.
c. Flexible.
d. Verifiable.
e. Applicable.
4. Modifications that are made to hypotheses to allow for unexpected or unfavorable pieces of evidence are called:
a. Ad hoc modifications.
b. Hypothetical expansions.
c. Moot hypotheses.
d. Explanatory mutations.
e. Ex post facto modifications.
5. As a result of the application of Ockham’s razor, naturalistic explanations are preferred to supernatural explanations
because:
a. Naturalistic explanations lead to entirely new ways of viewing the world.
b. Naturalistic explanations are preferred by atheists.
c. Supernatural explanations are inconsistent with well confirmed scientific theories.
d. Supernatural explanations are always contaminated by religious beliefs.
e. Supernatural explanations introduce a whole new set of entities into the picture.
6. According to Imre Lakatos and Paul Thagard, science is distinguished from pseudoscience in that science is:
a. Directional.
b. Progressive.
c. Rational.
d. Developmental.
e. Instructive.