e. Some autocrats with vision are not sane leaders.
Syllogism 2I
Given the following syllogism:
Some factually incorrect accounts are interesting novels, for some inspired stories are factually correct accounts, and all
boring novels are uninspired stories.
24. After reducing the number of terms in Syllogism 2I, the conclusion is:
a. Some interesting novels are not factually correct accounts.
b. Some inspired stories are not factually correct accounts.
c. All inspired stories are interesting novels.
d. Some factually correct accounts are interesting novels.
e. Some inspired stories are factually correct accounts.
25. For Syllogism 2I, the major premise is:
a. No boring novels are inspired stories.
b. Some inspired stories are factually correct accounts.
c. Some inspired stories are not factually correct accounts.
d. All inspired stories are interesting novels.
e. Some interesting novels are not factually correct accounts.
26. For Syllogism 2I, the minor premise is:
a. Some inspired stories are factually correct accounts.
b. Some interesting novels are factually correct accounts.
c. Some interesting novels are not factually correct accounts.
d. No boring novels are inspired stories.
e. All inspired stories are interesting novels.
Syllogism 3I
Given the following syllogism:
Taffy must not be a dog because Taffy climbs trees and dogs never climb trees.
27. After translating Syllogism 3I into standard form, the conclusion is:
a. All animals identical to Taffy are not dogs.
b. All cats are animals that climb trees.
c. No animals identical to Taffy are dogs.
d. All animals identical to Taffy are animals that climb trees.
e. No dogs are animals that climb trees.
28. For Syllogism 3I, the major premise is:
a. All animals identical to Taffy are animals that climb trees.
b. All animals identical to Taffy are cats.
c. All dogs are not animals that climb trees.