e. All meaningful employments are rewarding occupations.
Syllogism 2D
Given the following syllogism:
Some low class characters are not people with money, so some people without money are not honest souls, since no
dishonest souls are high class characters.
24. After reducing the number of terms in Syllogism 2D, the conclusion is:
a. Some people without money are not high class characters.
b. All dishonest souls are low class characters.
c. Some people with money are not honest souls.
d. All high class characters are honest souls.
e. Some people without money are not honest souls.
25. For Syllogism 2D, the major premise is:
a. Some people without money are not honest souls.
b. Some people without money are not high class characters.
c. All dishonest souls are low class characters.
d. All high class characters are honest souls.
e. No low class characters are honest souls.
26. For Syllogism 2D, the minor premise is:
a. Some people without money are not honest souls.
b. Some high class characters are not people without money.
c. Some people without money are not high class characters.
d. No high class characters are dishonest souls.
e. All high class characters are honest souls.
Syllogism 3D
Given the following syllogism:
Edward gets angry whenever customers complain. Thus, Edward must have been angry yesterday, because customers
were complaining yesterday.
27. After translating Syllogism 3D into standard form, the conclusion is:
a. All times Edward gets angry are times customers complain.
b. All times identical to yesterday are times Edward gets angry.
c. All times customers complain are times Edward gets angry.
d. All persons identical to Edward are persons who got angry yesterday.
e. All times identical to yesterday are times customers complain.
28. For Syllogism 3D, the major premise is:
a. All times Edward gets angry are times customers complain.
b. All times identical to yesterday are times customers complain.