e. Some attractive images are not altered photos.
Syllogism 2C
Given the following syllogism:
No dogs that do not love children are reliable watchdogs, since all dogs that don’t bite are unreliable watchdogs, and no
dogs that love children are dogs that bite.
24. After reducing the number of terms in Syllogism 2C, the conclusion is:
a. All reliable watchdogs are dogs that love children.
b. No dogs that love children are dogs that bite.
c. All reliable watchdogs are dogs that bite.
d. All dogs that bite are reliable watchdogs.
e. All dogs that love children are reliable watchdogs.
25. For Syllogism 2C, the major premise is:
a. All dogs that don’t bite are dogs that love children.
b. All reliable watchdogs are dogs that love children.
c. No dogs that love children are dogs that bite.
d. All reliable watchdogs are dogs that bite.
e. All dogs that love children are reliable watchdogs.
26. For Syllogism 2C, the minor premise is:
a. All dogs that love children are reliable watchdogs.
b. All reliable watchdogs are dogs that bite.
c. No dogs that love children are dogs that bite.
d. All dogs that bite are reliable watchdogs.
e. All reliable watchdogs are dogs that love children.
Syllogism 3C
Given the following syllogism:
There are applicants who are not trustworthy, because whoever has a criminal record is untrustworthy, and several
applicants have criminal records.
27. After translating Syllogism 3C into standard form, the conclusion is:
a. No people with criminal records are trustworthy people.
b. Some applicants have criminal records.
c. Some applicants are people with criminal records.
d. Some applicants are not trustworthy people.
e. Some trustworthy people are not applicants.
28. For Syllogism 3C, the major premise is:
a. No people with criminal records are trustworthy people.
b. Some applicants are not trustworthy people.