INSTRUCTIONS: Select the answer that best characterizes each argument.
1. Frank Larsen argues for stricter gun control. It appears that Frank wants to abolish access to guns altogether. But if law-
abiding citizens can’t own a gun, then they will have no means of defending themselves against criminals. Obviously
Frank’s argument is no good.
a. False cause.
b. Argument against the person, abusive.
c. Straw man.
d. No fallacy.
e. Red herring.
2. Dr. Sylvia Newman, the world famous biochemist, says that the widespread use of pesticides poses a serious threat to
public health. Therefore, we should take this warning seriously and investigate further the extent of the threat.
a. Appeal to force.
b. Appeal to the people.
c. Appeal to unqualified authority.
d. Begging the question.
e. No fallacy.
3. United Airlines flight 863 was late arriving in Houston, and flight 722 was late getting into LA—as was flight 429.
Apparently all United Airlines flights are late these days.
a. Hasty generalization.
b. False cause.
c. No fallacy.
d. Composition.
e. Accident.
4. April Bradley’s arguments in favor of solar power are hardly worth listening to. After all, look where she graduated
from—Northeast Texas State. That’s hardly Ivy League. And look at how she dresses. Yuck!
a. Hasty generalization.
b. Begging the question.
c. False cause
d. Argument against the person, abusive.
e. No fallacy.
5. Barbara lost 15 pounds after taking the new InstaThin supplement for 6 weeks. Tiffany has the same metabolism,
lifestyle, diet, body type, age, height and former weight as Barbara. Therefore, probably Tiffany could lose about 15
pounds if she takes InstaThin for 6 weeks.
a. Weak analogy.
b. No fallacy.
c. Amphiboly.
d. Argument against the person, circumstantial.
e. False cause.